Raycaster / evalsBack to AI Agents for Cross-Border Regulatory Review

APEX-Agents · Management Consulting

World132_SF_Task05

0/9Fail

APEX-Agents task World132_SF_Task05 in AI Agents for Cross-Border Regulatory Review. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models — rubric criteria, scores, and public traces.

AI Agents for Cross-Border Regulatory ReviewManagement Consulting World 132Dual harnessGrader: rubric
task_40e74d7e89d54b9ca07a5c778865c090
Management Consulting World 132
message_in_console
5 models · dual config

Task prompt

What the agent was asked to do

Comparing the revised projections for 2026-2030, what is the change in Japanese and Global 2026 results for Gross Profit and EBITDA in both dollar and percentage terms? If the 2026 Marketing costs in the Japanese market had instead improved to $2.33M, what will the 2026 Japanese market COGS need to be in order for to limit the global percentage change in EBITDA to -5%? Round intermediate and final calculations to 4 decimal places. Return all outputs as a message to me here.

Published trajectories

Agent runs on this task

Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.

ModelHarnessScoreResultLinks
GPT-5.5showcasedual0/9Fail
Gemini 3.1 Produal1/9Fail
GPT-5.4dual0/9Fail
GPT-5.4 minidual0/9Fail
GPT-5.4 nanodual0/9Fail

Grading rubric

Criteria and grader verdict (showcase run)

  1. States that the 2026 dollar change in Japanese Gross Profit is -$0.5000M

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states Japan Gross Profit $ Change is "-37.0800". Assessment: Criterion requires stating 2026 dollar change in Japanese Gross Profit is -$0.5000M; response gives a different value, so fail.

  2. States that the 2026 dollar change in Global Gross Profit is -$0.5000M

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states Global Gross Profit $ Change is "-82.3600". Assessment: Criterion requires stating 2026 dollar change in Global Gross Profit is -$0.5000M; response gives a different value, so fail.

  3. States that the 2026 percentage change in Japanese Gross Profit is -25.0000%

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states Japan Gross Profit % Change is "-105.7013%". Assessment: Criterion requires -25.0000%; response gives a different percentage, so fail.

  4. States that the 2026 percentage change in Global Gross Profit is -0.2784%

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states Global Gross Profit % Change is "-31.4399%". Assessment: Criterion requires -0.2784%; response gives a different percentage, so fail.

  5. States that the 2026 dollar change in Japanese EBITDA is -$0.2000M

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states Japan EBITDA $ Change is "-22.2800". Assessment: Criterion requires stating 2026 dollar change in Japanese EBITDA is -$0.2000M; response gives a different value, so fail.

  6. States that the 2026 dollar change in Global EBITDA is -$0.2000M

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states Global EBITDA $ Change is "-102.4800". Assessment: Criterion requires stating 2026 dollar change in Global EBITDA is -$0.2000M; response gives a different value, so fail.

  7. States that the 2026 percentage change in Japanese EBITDA is -2.2222%

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states Japan EBITDA % Change is "-167.7711%". Assessment: Criterion requires -2.2222%; response gives a different percentage, so fail.

  8. States that the 2026 percentage change in Global EBITDA is -5.8824%

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states Global EBITDA % Change is "-103.4316%". Assessment: Criterion requires -5.8824%; response gives a different percentage, so fail.

  9. States that the revised 2026 Japanese market COGS to limit the Global EBITDA change to -5% is $5.8400M

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> Answer states "the 2026 Japanese market COGS line would need to be +$91.8560M." Assessment: Criterion requires $5.8400M; response gives a different value, so fail.