APEX-Agents · Management Consulting

World132_SF_Task04

10/10Pass

APEX-Agents task World132_SF_Task04 in AI Agents for M&A Legal Due Diligence. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models — rubric criteria, scores, and public traces.

AI Agents for M&A Legal Due DiligenceManagement Consulting World 132Dual harnessGrader: rubric

Task IDtask_3d664fce59f541528e5e9b7cef207774

WorldManagement Consulting World 132

Expected outputmessage_in_console

Published runs5 models · dual config

Task prompt

What the agent was asked to do

Using the consumer perception data and pricing details from the buyer profile, determine how many survey respondents in each market have never heard of PureLife and are willing to pay more than a 30% premium above average price for trusted brands. Give it as both a count and as a percentage by market. In which of the three surveyed markets would these customers be willing to pay more than $20 for a trusted brand? State both the market(s) and the price(s). All intermediate and final calculations should be rounded to three decimal places. Return all of the outputs to me as a message in here.

Published trajectories

Agent runs on this task

Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.

Model	Harness	Score	Result	Links
GPT-5.5showcase	dual	10/10	Pass	Share page Public trace
Gemini 3.1 Pro	dual	10/10	Pass	Share page Public trace
GPT-5.4	dual	10/10	Pass	Share page Public trace
GPT-5.4 mini	dual	10/10	Pass	Share page Public trace
GPT-5.4 nano	dual	10/10	Pass	Share page Public trace

Grading rubric

Criteria and grader verdict (showcase run)

States that the number of survey respondents in Brazil that have never heard of PureLife and are willing to pay more than a 30% premium above average price for trusted brands is 3
Pass
Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE table lists for Brazil: “Matching respondents | 3.000.” Assessment: Criterion asks whether the response states Brazil count is 3; pass because 3.000 is equivalent to 3.
States that the number of survey respondents in Eastern Europe that have never heard of PureLife and are willing to pay more than a 30% premium above average price for trusted brands is 5
Pass
Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE table lists for Eastern Europe: “Matching respondents | 5.000.” Assessment: Criterion asks whether the response states Eastern Europe count is 5; pass because 5.000 is equivalent to 5.
States that the number of survey respondents in Japan that have never heard of PureLife and are willing to pay more than a 30% premium above average price for trusted brands is 2
Pass
Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE table lists for Japan: “Matching respondents | 2.000.” Assessment: Criterion asks whether the response states Japan count is 2; pass because 2.000 is equivalent to 2.
States that the percentage of survey respondents in Brazil that have never heard of PureLife and are willing to pay more than a 30% premium above average price for trusted brands is 7.500%
Pass
Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE table lists for Brazil: “Percentage of market | 7.500%.” Assessment: Criterion asks whether the response states Brazil percentage is 7.500%; pass.
States that the percentage of survey respondents in Eastern Europe that have never heard of PureLife and are willing to pay more than a 30% premium above average price for trusted brands is 12.500%
Pass
Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE table lists for Eastern Europe: “Percentage of market | 12.500%.” Assessment: Criterion asks whether the response states Eastern Europe percentage is 12.500%; pass.
States that the percentage of survey respondents in Japan that have never heard of PureLife and are willing to pay more than a 30% premium above average price for trusted brands is 5.000%
Pass
Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE table lists for Japan: “Percentage of market | 5.000%.” Assessment: Criterion asks whether the response states Japan percentage is 5.000%; pass.
States that one of the three surveyed markets where customers willing to pay more than 30% above average price for a trusted brand would be willing to pay more than $20 for a trusted brand is Brazil
Pass
Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE pricing table marks Brazil “Above $20.000? | Yes,” and conclusion says “Brazil — $20.605.” Assessment: Criterion asks whether Brazil is stated as one of the markets above $20; pass.
States that one of the three surveyed markets where customers willing to pay more than 30% above average price for a trusted brand would be willing to pay more than $20 for a trusted brand is Japan
Pass
Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE pricing table marks Japan “Above $20.000? | Yes,” and conclusion says “Japan — $33.475.” Assessment: Criterion asks whether Japan is stated as one of the markets above $20; pass.
States that the price that customers in Brazil, who are willing to pay more than 30% above average price for a trusted brand and pay more than $20, is $20.605
Pass
Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE conclusion lists “Brazil — $20.605” after calculating a “30.000% premium price.” Assessment: Criterion asks whether the response states Brazil price is $20.605; pass.
States that the price that customers in Japan, who are willing to pay more than 30% above average price for a trusted brand and pay more than $20, is $33.475
Pass
Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE conclusion lists “Japan — $33.475” after calculating a “30.000% premium price.” Assessment: Criterion asks whether the response states Japan price is $33.475; pass.