Raycaster/ Eval

APEX-Agents

gpt-5.5 on World417_TG_01

6/9Fail
Domain
Law
Category
AI Agents for Employment Law Analysis
Harness
dual

Grader rubric

Criteria verdict

  1. States that Brown's employment is at-will under California law

    Pass
  2. States that illegal termination is an exception to at-will employment in California

    Pass
  3. States that violation of public policy termination is an exception to at-will employment in California

    Pass
  4. States that contractual language that prohibits termination is an exception to at-will employment in California

    Fail
  5. States that violation of the implied covenant of good faith termination is an exception to at-will employment in California

    Fail
  6. States that Brown's allegations do not fall within an exception to at-will employment under California law

    Pass
  7. States that Brown does not have a valid wrongful termination claim

    Pass
  8. States that Brown is not an eligible employee within the meaning of the FMLA

    Fail
  9. States that Chasing Streams did not violate the FMLA by denying Brown's leave request

    Pass

Prompt excerpt

Task context

We just received a demand letter from Isaiah’s counsel. He alleges wrongful termination and FMLA interference. Can you look into the validity of his claims and return me back a write-up of what you find? I want you to just write your answer right here.

Response trace

Agent response, tools, files, and edits

Open full trace

On a phone, the interactive viewer works best full-screen — pick the narrative report or the files & trajectory workspace.

Why Eval exists · why Workspace exists

Public evidence and cloud agents are the same harness.

Eval exists so scores are inspectable—tasks, trajectories, artifacts, and rubric verdicts anyone can open.Workspace exists so people can automate real file work with that harness, and so Raycaster never evaluates work it cannot perform.