Raycaster/ Eval

APEX-Agents · Law

World417_TG_01

Best published6/9Fail

APEX-Agents task World417_TG_01 in AI Agents for Employment Law Analysis. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models, scores, and public traces.

AI Agents for Employment Law AnalysisLaw World 417Dual harnessGrader: rubric
task_d8119ffe94d4444dbfb6626cf3eab3a2
Law World 417
message_in_console
7 models · dual config

Task prompt

What the agent was asked to do

We just received a demand letter from Isaiah’s counsel. He alleges wrongful termination and FMLA interference. Can you look into the validity of his claims and return me back a write-up of what you find? I want you to just write your answer right here.

Published trajectories

Agent runs on this task

Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.

ModelHarnessScoreResultLinks
GPT-5.5dual6/9Fail
Gemini 3 Flashdual3/9Fail
GPT-5.4 minidual3/9Fail
Gemini 3.1 Produal2/9Fail
GPT-5.4dual1/9Fail
fireworks models Kimi K2dual0/9Fail
GPT-5.4 nanodual0/9Fail

Grading rubric

Rubric criteria

Runs are graded against these criteria. Open a run for model-specific verdicts.

  1. States that Brown's employment is at-will under California law

  2. States that illegal termination is an exception to at-will employment in California

  3. States that violation of public policy termination is an exception to at-will employment in California

  4. States that contractual language that prohibits termination is an exception to at-will employment in California

  5. States that violation of the implied covenant of good faith termination is an exception to at-will employment in California

  6. States that Brown's allegations do not fall within an exception to at-will employment under California law

  7. States that Brown does not have a valid wrongful termination claim

  8. States that Brown is not an eligible employee within the meaning of the FMLA

  9. States that Chasing Streams did not violate the FMLA by denying Brown's leave request