APEX-Agents
gpt-5.4-mini on LawWorld417_NE_03
Grader rubric
Criteria verdict
States Yes, a separate revenue agreement between ChasingStreams and each of the talent is required for the project
States that the IP & Content Ownership Policy requires a separate revenue agreement for a Co-Created Work
States that the project is a Co-Created Work under the IP & Content Ownership Policy
States that ChasingStreams contributed $30,000 in production costs to the Talent's project
States that ChasingStreams must contribute at least $25,000 to the cost of a production for it to constitute a Co-Created Work
States that ChasingStream's financial contribution to the project's production cost exceeds the threshold amount required for a project to constitute a Co-Created Work under the IP & Content Ownership Policy
Prompt excerpt
Task context
We're helping one of ChasingStreams's talent partners create a project for distribution on their channel(s). In addition to providing the production stages, ChasingStreams will contribute $10,000 cash plus $20,000 in employee time. We're otherwise staying hands-off with the project. Do we need any separate agreements with the talent? Give m the answer straight here and explain why, briefly.
Response trace
Agent response, tools, files, and edits
On a phone, the interactive viewer works best full-screen — pick the narrative report or the files & trajectory workspace.
Why Eval exists · why Workspace exists
Public evidence and cloud agents are the same harness.
Eval exists so scores are inspectable—tasks, trajectories, artifacts, and rubric verdicts anyone can open.Workspace exists so people can automate real file work with that harness, and so Raycaster never evaluates work it cannot perform.