Raycaster/ Eval

APEX-Agents · Law

LawWorld417_NE_03

Best published6/6Pass

APEX-Agents task LawWorld417_NE_03 in AI Agents for Employment Law Analysis. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models, scores, and public traces.

AI Agents for Employment Law AnalysisLaw World 417Dual harnessGrader: rubric
task_384b35183b374b5482edfff4f071c834
Law World 417
message_in_console
6 models · dual config

Task prompt

What the agent was asked to do

We're helping one of ChasingStreams's talent partners create a project for distribution on their channel(s). In addition to providing the production stages, ChasingStreams will contribute $10,000 cash plus $20,000 in employee time. We're otherwise staying hands-off with the project. Do we need any separate agreements with the talent? Give m the answer straight here and explain why, briefly.

Published trajectories

Agent runs on this task

Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.

ModelHarnessScoreResultLinks
Gemini 3.1 Produal6/6Pass
GPT-5.4dual5/6Fail
GPT-5.4 minidual3/6Fail
GPT-5.5dual2/6Fail
GPT-5.4 nanodual1/6Fail
fireworks models Kimi K2dual0/6Fail

Grading rubric

Rubric criteria

Runs are graded against these criteria. Open a run for model-specific verdicts.

  1. States Yes, a separate revenue agreement between ChasingStreams and each of the talent is required for the project

  2. States that the IP & Content Ownership Policy requires a separate revenue agreement for a Co-Created Work

  3. States that the project is a Co-Created Work under the IP & Content Ownership Policy

  4. States that ChasingStreams contributed $30,000 in production costs to the Talent's project

  5. States that ChasingStreams must contribute at least $25,000 to the cost of a production for it to constitute a Co-Created Work

  6. States that ChasingStream's financial contribution to the project's production cost exceeds the threshold amount required for a project to constitute a Co-Created Work under the IP & Content Ownership Policy