Raycaster/ Eval

APEX-Agents

gpt-5.4-mini on LawWorld417_ANB_04

1/1Pass
Domain
Law
Category
AI Agents for Privacy and GDPR Compliance
Harness
dual

Grader rubric

Criteria verdict

  1. States that the amount that ParaZon is liable to Sarah Rodriguez under the WARN Act is $0

Prompt excerpt

Task context

Chasing Streams fired its entire facilities department and Head of Production before ParaZon acquired it. Sarah Rodriguez filed a Complaint on July 4, 2025 against ParaZon claiming not enough notice was given to her, and damages from breach of her employment contract. How much is ParaZon liable to Sarah in damages for insufficient notice under the California WARN Act? Give me your reply back here as a message.

Response trace

Agent response, tools, files, and edits

Open full trace

On a phone, the interactive viewer works best full-screen — pick the narrative report or the files & trajectory workspace.

Why Eval exists · why Workspace exists

Public evidence and cloud agents are the same harness.

Eval exists so scores are inspectable—tasks, trajectories, artifacts, and rubric verdicts anyone can open.Workspace exists so people can automate real file work with that harness, and so Raycaster never evaluates work it cannot perform.