APEX-Agents · Law
LawWorld417_ANB_04
APEX-Agents task LawWorld417_ANB_04 in AI Agents for Privacy and GDPR Compliance. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models — rubric criteria, scores, and public traces.
Task prompt
What the agent was asked to do
Chasing Streams fired its entire facilities department and Head of Production before ParaZon acquired it. Sarah Rodriguez filed a Complaint on July 4, 2025 against ParaZon claiming not enough notice was given to her, and damages from breach of her employment contract. How much is ParaZon liable to Sarah in damages for insufficient notice under the California WARN Act? Give me your reply back here as a message.
Published trajectories
Agent runs on this task
Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.
| Model | Harness | Score | Result | Links |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5.5showcase | dual | 1/1 | Pass | Share pagePublic trace |
| fireworks models Kimi K2 | dual | 0/1 | Fail | Share pagePublic trace |
| Gemini 3 Flash | dual | 1/1 | Pass | Share pagePublic trace |
| Gemini 3.1 Pro | dual | 1/1 | Pass | Share pagePublic trace |
| GPT-5.4 | dual | 1/1 | Pass | Share pagePublic trace |
| GPT-5.4 mini | dual | 1/1 | Pass | Share pagePublic trace |
| GPT-5.4 nano | dual | 0/1 | Fail | Share pagePublic trace |
Grading rubric
Criteria and grader verdict (showcase run)
States that the amount that ParaZon is liable to Sarah Rodriguez under the WARN Act is $0
PassEvidence: The response states, “ParaZon’s California WARN Act damages exposure to Sarah Rodriguez is $0” and concludes “ParaZon’s liability to Sarah for insufficient notice under California WARN is $0.” Assessment: Criterion requires stating that ParaZon is liable to Sarah Rodriguez under the WARN Act for $0; pass because the response clearly states this amount.