Raycaster/ Eval

APEX-Agents

gpt-5.5 on Law433_mk-01

3/4Fail
Domain
Law
Category
AI Agents for Privacy and GDPR Compliance
Harness
dual

Grader rubric

Criteria verdict

  1. States that Magnolia’s strongest argument is that the Residency Agreement’s Entire Agreement clause states that the written contract constitutes the parties’ entire agreement

    Pass
  2. States that there is no language in the Residency Agreement which mandates weekly communication with the family

    Pass
  3. States that the family's strongest argument is that the Residency Agreement expressly incorporates the Resident Handbook by reference, making it part of the contract in its entirety

    Pass
  4. States that Section 8 of the 2023 Resident Handbook states that families receive weekly care item reports

    Fail

Prompt excerpt

Task context

We have received a claim from Thomas Whitaker’s counsel asserting that Magnolia breached its obligations by failing to provide weekly communication to Mr. Whitaker's family. Provide the strongest argument that Magnolia has no contractual obligation to provide weekly care updates, and the family's strongest counterargument, in no more than four sentences. Reply back to me in here and describe what you find.

Response trace

Agent response, tools, files, and edits

Open full trace

On a phone, the interactive viewer works best full-screen — pick the narrative report or the files & trajectory workspace.

Why Eval exists · why Workspace exists

Public evidence and cloud agents are the same harness.

Eval exists so scores are inspectable—tasks, trajectories, artifacts, and rubric verdicts anyone can open.Workspace exists so people can automate real file work with that harness, and so Raycaster never evaluates work it cannot perform.