Raycaster/ Eval

APEX-Agents · Law

Law433_mk-01

Best published4/4Pass

APEX-Agents task Law433_mk-01 in AI Agents for Privacy and GDPR Compliance. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models, scores, and public traces.

AI Agents for Privacy and GDPR ComplianceLaw World 433Dual harnessGrader: rubric
task_908f411c435d4ebf8fcfc4a08e7dce5b
Law World 433
message_in_console
7 models · dual config

Task prompt

What the agent was asked to do

We have received a claim from Thomas Whitaker’s counsel asserting that Magnolia breached its obligations by failing to provide weekly communication to Mr. Whitaker's family. Provide the strongest argument that Magnolia has no contractual obligation to provide weekly care updates, and the family's strongest counterargument, in no more than four sentences. Reply back to me in here and describe what you find.

Published trajectories

Agent runs on this task

Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.

ModelHarnessScoreResultLinks
Gemini 3 Flashdual4/4Pass
Gemini 3.1 Produal3/4Fail
GPT-5.4dual3/4Fail
GPT-5.5dual3/4Fail
fireworks models Kimi K2dual2/4Fail
GPT-5.4 minidual2/4Fail
GPT-5.4 nanodual2/4Fail

Grading rubric

Rubric criteria

Runs are graded against these criteria. Open a run for model-specific verdicts.

  1. States that Magnolia’s strongest argument is that the Residency Agreement’s Entire Agreement clause states that the written contract constitutes the parties’ entire agreement

  2. States that there is no language in the Residency Agreement which mandates weekly communication with the family

  3. States that the family's strongest argument is that the Residency Agreement expressly incorporates the Resident Handbook by reference, making it part of the contract in its entirety

  4. States that Section 8 of the 2023 Resident Handbook states that families receive weekly care item reports