APEX-Agents · Investment Banking

World 246_MM_03

0/5Fail

APEX-Agents task World 246_MM_03 in AI Agents for Maritime and Environmental Liability. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models — rubric criteria, scores, and public traces.

AI Agents for Maritime and Environmental LiabilityInvestment Banking World 246Dual harnessGrader: rubric

Task IDtask_7937759836244ed4a9cfb65c70e0e746

WorldInvestment Banking World 246

Expected outputmessage_in_console

Published runs4 models · dual config

Task prompt

What the agent was asked to do

Please get the most recent financial year’s EV/FCF multiples (cutoff date 20 Dec 2025) for the public comparables, as per the slides deck, to calculate a cleaned average using the Modified z-score (Median + MAD) approach, with cutoff = 3.0 for outliers (use the standard scaling constant). Then, use this average as exit multiple to calculate terminal value (TV) and baseline EV for Kenvue. What is the implied share price and the difference relative to the initial implied share price as per the DCF model? For final answers, round TV and EV in nearest million, share price and multiples to two decimal places. Carry full precision for intermediate calculations. Print your answer to me here.

Published trajectories

Agent runs on this task

Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.

Model	Harness	Score	Result	Links
GPT-5.5showcase	dual	0/5	Fail	Share page Public trace
Gemini 3.1 Pro	dual	0/5	Fail	Share page Public trace
GPT-5.4 mini	dual	0/5	Fail	Share page Public trace
GPT-5.4 nano	dual	0/5	Fail	Share page Public trace

Grading rubric

Criteria and grader verdict (showcase run)

States the cleaned average using the Modified z-score is 22.75
Fail
Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE states “Cleaned average EV/FCF exit multiple: 21.40x” and median/MAD screen with “No observations were excluded.” Assessment: Criterion requires stating the cleaned average is 22.75; response gives 21.40, so fail.
States the terminal value is $47,768 million
Fail
Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE table lists “Terminal Value | $44,934mm.” Assessment: Criterion requires terminal value of $47,768 million; response states $44,934 million, so fail.
States the EV is $42,192 million
Fail
Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE table lists “Baseline Enterprise Value | $40,195mm.” Assessment: Criterion requires EV of $42,192 million; response states $40,195 million, so fail.
States the implied share price is $18.13
Fail
Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE states “Implied Share Price | $17.09” and “updated implied share price is $17.09.” Assessment: Criterion requires implied share price $18.13; response gives $17.09, so fail.
States the difference relative the initial implied share price is $0.64
Fail
Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE states “Difference vs. Initial | ($0.40), or (2.29%)” and “$0.40 lower.” Assessment: Criterion requires the difference relative to initial implied share price is $0.64; response states a $0.40 decrease, so fail.