Raycaster / evalsBack to AI Agents for M&A Legal Due Diligence

APEX-Agents · Management Consulting

World 134_RG_04

0/6Fail

APEX-Agents task World 134_RG_04 in AI Agents for M&A Legal Due Diligence. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models — rubric criteria, scores, and public traces.

AI Agents for M&A Legal Due DiligenceManagement Consulting World 134Dual harnessGrader: rubric
task_d87f70c7f8d74665ac3ddcbef5a8d67a
Management Consulting World 134
message_in_console
5 models · dual config

Task prompt

What the agent was asked to do

One of CompliSure’s primary competitors, TrainIQ, is expected to lose a portion of its market share. Use the estimates provided by each research firm (A, B, C), provided in the attached report, as separate scenarios. For each scenario, assume that the overall market size in 2025 does not change, and that any market share lost by TrainIQ is fully captured by CompliSure, with no impact on other competitors. Starting from CompliSure’s 2025 base-case outlook, state the new CompliSure’s market share (%) and revenue in 2025 for each research-firm scenario. Use our latest version of the 5-year forecast and the expanded version of the financial dataset to do the analysis. Round all the final answers to two decimal places and round $ figures to $0.01M. Give your answer back to me right here.

Published trajectories

Agent runs on this task

Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.

ModelHarnessScoreResultLinks
GPT-5.5showcasedual0/6Fail
Gemini 3.1 Produal6/6Pass
GPT-5.4dual0/6Fail
GPT-5.4 minidual6/6Pass
GPT-5.4 nanodual6/6Pass

Grading rubric

Criteria and grader verdict (showcase run)

  1. States that New CompliSure’s 2025 Market share for the Firm 1 scenario is 11.05%

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states for “Firm A” the “New CompliSure market share” is “12.49%.” Assessment: Criterion requires stating Firm 1 scenario market share is 11.05%; the response does not state this value, so fail.

  2. States that New CompliSure’s 2025 Market share for the Firm 2 scenario is 11.99%

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states for “Firm B” the “New CompliSure market share” is “13.38%.” Assessment: Criterion requires stating Firm 2 scenario market share is 11.99%; the response does not state this value, so fail.

  3. States that New CompliSure’s 2025 Market share for the Firm 3 scenario is 13.10%

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states for “Firm C” the “New CompliSure market share” is “14.45%.” Assessment: Criterion requires stating Firm 3 scenario market share is 13.10%; the response does not state this value, so fail.

  4. States that the New CompliSure’s 2025 Revenue for Firm 1 scenario is $46.76M

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states for “Firm A” the “New CompliSure 2025 revenue” is “$55.22M.” Assessment: Criterion requires Firm 1 scenario revenue of $46.76M; the response does not state this value, so fail.

  5. States that the New CompliSure’s 2025 Revenue for Firm 2 scenario is $50.70M

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states for “Firm B” the “New CompliSure 2025 revenue” is “$59.16M.” Assessment: Criterion requires Firm 2 scenario revenue of $50.70M; the response does not state this value, so fail.

  6. States that the New CompliSure’s 2025 Revenue for Firm 3 scenario is $55.42M

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states for “Firm C” the “New CompliSure 2025 revenue” is “$63.88M.” Assessment: Criterion requires Firm 3 scenario revenue of $55.42M; the response does not state this value, so fail.