Raycaster/ Eval

APEX-Agents · Management Consulting

World 127_HLV_Task 03

Best published4/6Fail

APEX-Agents task World 127_HLV_Task 03 in AI Agents for Automotive EV Transition Strategy. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models, scores, and public traces.

AI Agents for Automotive EV Transition StrategyManagement Consulting World 127Dual harnessGrader: rubric
task_626333c69ffb46d0ad041a2dd6916fdf
Management Consulting World 127
message_in_console
5 models · dual config

Task prompt

What the agent was asked to do

We want to understand the most important investment areas for pureplay EV respondents. The previous file contained incomplete information, so please use the newly attached updated file. Identify the #1 and #2 most important investment areas for pureplay EV respondents. Using only respondents who selected those two areas as their #1 and #2 priorities, calculate the average score for: (1) Relevance of legacy suppliers and (2) Level of redesign required. Then compare these average scores to the averages calculated using only Auto Parts respondents. Round all final scores to two decimal places and output the results to me here as a short message.

Published trajectories

Agent runs on this task

Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.

ModelHarnessScoreResultLinks
Gemini 3.1 Produal4/6Fail
GPT-5.4dual4/6Fail
GPT-5.4 minidual4/6Fail
GPT-5.4 nanodual4/6Fail
GPT-5.5dual4/6Fail

Grading rubric

Rubric criteria

Runs are graded against these criteria. Open a run for model-specific verdicts.

  1. States that Advanced materials is one of the two most important areas for investment

  2. States that Manufacturing automation is is one of the two most important areas for investment

  3. States that the average score for relevance of legacy suppliers for Pureplay EV respondents who selected at least one of the top two important areas for investments is 2.20

  4. States that the average score for Pureplay EV respondents who selected at least one of the top two important areas for investments level of redesign required is 3.20

  5. States that the average score for all Autoparts respondents for relevance of legacy suppliers is 2.57

  6. States that the average score for all Autoparts respondents for level of redesign required is 2.79