Raycaster / evalsBack to AI Agents for M&A Legal Due Diligence

APEX-Agents · Management Consulting

W134 Nancy Task 06

3/5Fail

APEX-Agents task W134 Nancy Task 06 in AI Agents for M&A Legal Due Diligence. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models — rubric criteria, scores, and public traces.

AI Agents for M&A Legal Due DiligenceManagement Consulting World 134Dual harnessGrader: rubric
task_4abd78ac38024a0094fa9ae0cfd31625
Management Consulting World 134
make_new_slide_deck
5 models · dual config

Task prompt

What the agent was asked to do

Create a new slide pptx, summarizing the comparable SaaS deals' target company name, purchase price, ARR, and ARR multiple. Include all targets for which we have an individual case study and use only publicly disclosed data. Round multiples to one decimal point and, for financial values, provide numbers in millions rounded to the nearest million or, if above 1 billion, in billions with one decimal place. Get insights from the comparable SaaS deals, the internal memo about valuation ranges and negotiation levers, and the case studies about Beacon, Stuzo, TASK, Claap and Statsig.

Published trajectories

Agent runs on this task

Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.

ModelHarnessScoreResultLinks
GPT-5.5showcasedual3/5Fail
Gemini 3.1 Produal5/5Pass
GPT-5.4dual5/5Pass
GPT-5.4 minidual5/5Pass
GPT-5.4 nanodual5/5Pass

Grading rubric

Criteria and grader verdict (showcase run)

  1. States that the Stuzo ARR multiple is 4.8x

    Fail

    Evidence: In `/root/workspace/Comparable SaaS Deals Summary.pptx` slide table, Stuzo row shows ARR multiple as "<=4.8x"; footnote says "$40M+ ARR rows show ceiling multiples using $40M." Assessment: Criterion requires "States that the Stuzo ARR multiple is 4.8x." The slide does not state it as exactly 4.8x, but as a ceiling/less-than-or-equal value. Fail.

  2. States that the TASK ARR multiple is 5.2x

    Fail

    Evidence: In `/root/workspace/Comparable SaaS Deals Summary.pptx` slide table, TASK Group row shows ARR multiple as "<=5.2x"; footnote says "$40M+ ARR rows show ceiling multiples using $40M." Assessment: Criterion requires "States that the TASK ARR multiple is 5.2x." The slide qualifies it as less-than-or-equal/ceiling rather than stating exactly 5.2x. Fail.

  3. States that the Claap ARR multiple is not available

    Pass

    Evidence: In `/root/workspace/Comparable SaaS Deals Summary.pptx` slide table, Claap row shows Public ARR "N/D" and ARR multiple "N/M"; footnote defines "N/M = not meaningful because target ARR is not publicly disclosed." Assessment: Criterion requires "States that the Claap ARR multiple is not available." N/M with the stated explanation clearly conveys that the ARR multiple is not available/not meaningful. Pass.

  4. States that the Statsig ARR multiple is not available

    Pass

    Evidence: In `/root/workspace/Comparable SaaS Deals Summary.pptx` slide table, Statsig row shows Public ARR "N/D" and ARR multiple "N/M"; footnote defines "N/M = not meaningful because target ARR is not publicly disclosed." Assessment: Criterion requires "States that the Statsig ARR multiple is not available." N/M with the stated explanation clearly conveys that the ARR multiple is not available/not meaningful. Pass.

  5. States that the Beacon ARR multiple is 12.7x

    Pass

    Evidence: In `/root/workspace/Comparable SaaS Deals Summary.pptx` slide table, Beacon row shows ARR multiple "12.7x"; the interpretation box also says "Beacon at 12.7x ARR." Assessment: Criterion requires "States that the Beacon ARR multiple is 12.7x." This is explicitly stated. Pass.