APEX-Agents
Gemini 3.1 Pro on World434-TK-01
Grader rubric
Criteria verdict
States that under Hong Kong law, there is no public-policy prohibition on indemnification between private parties
States that the SPA directs the seller to reimburse the buyer for a loss suffered as a result of a pre-completion non-compliance fine
States that the indemnity works as drafted, under Hong Kong law
Prompt excerpt
Task context
Post-closing, the Fire Department issued a fine for pre-completion non-compliance at one of the facilities, and the buyer paid the fine to avoid operational disruption. Take a look at the Secure Box SPA indemnity structure. Can we recover that amount from the seller under the specific indemnity, or is there a Hong Kong public-policy issue with indemnifying regulatory penalties? I want to know whether the indemnity in the contract works or whether this is a gap. Summarize your answers briefly and reply with a message here.
Response trace
Agent response, tools, files, and edits
On a phone, the interactive viewer works best full-screen — pick the narrative report or the files & trajectory workspace.
Why Eval exists · why Workspace exists
Public evidence and cloud agents are the same harness.
Eval exists so scores are inspectable—tasks, trajectories, artifacts, and rubric verdicts anyone can open.Workspace exists so people can automate real file work with that harness, and so Raycaster never evaluates work it cannot perform.