Raycaster/ Eval

APEX-Agents

gpt-5.4-nano on World434_IG_01

3/3Pass
Domain
Law
Category
AI Agents for Real Estate Lease Review
Harness
dual

Grader rubric

Criteria verdict

  1. States that not all laws discussed in the third memo need to be complied with in the acquisition of Secure Box

  2. States that the acquisition must comply with Hong Kong law titled Conveyancing and Property Ordinance to the extent that real property interests are included in the acquisition

  3. States that the acquisition must comply with Hong Kong law titled Bills of Sale Ordinance to the extent that moveable assets are included in the acquisition

Prompt excerpt

Task context

We had a number of compliance memoranda drafted regarding our ongoing acquisition of the storage facility companies. For the third memo listed in the compendium, do we have to comply with all the laws that are discussed for our acquisition of Secure Box? If at least some laws apply, state which ones do. Write your reply to me in here.

Response trace

Agent response, tools, files, and edits

Open full trace

On a phone, the interactive viewer works best full-screen — pick the narrative report or the files & trajectory workspace.

Why Eval exists · why Workspace exists

Public evidence and cloud agents are the same harness.

Eval exists so scores are inspectable—tasks, trajectories, artifacts, and rubric verdicts anyone can open.Workspace exists so people can automate real file work with that harness, and so Raycaster never evaluates work it cannot perform.