APEX-Agents
GPT-5.4 on World433_JS_01
Grader rubric
Criteria verdict
States Yes, Magnolia Gardens is in compliance with Chapter 276 of Title 26 the Texas Administrative Code as to the pet deposit
States that Gregory Johns's dog, Courage, is not a service animal under Chapter 276 of Title 26 of the Texas Administrative Code
States that Magnolia can charge a pet deposit for pets that are not service animals
Prompt excerpt
Task context
Magnolia Gardens has a contract with the Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) to provide services, as an assisted living facility, to DHS clients. Gregory Johns--a disabled DHS client who is in a wheelchair, epileptic, and blind--has recently been admitted to Magnolia Gardens and has been charged a small pet deposit for his dog, Courage. Courage is Mr. Johns' emotional support animal. Is Magnolia Gardens in compliance with Chapter 276 of Title 26 of the Texas Administrative Code in regards to charging Gregory Johns a pet deposit? Reply to me right here with a clear answer, and explain your reasoning.
Response trace
Agent response, tools, files, and edits
On a phone, the interactive viewer works best full-screen — pick the narrative report or the files & trajectory workspace.
Why Eval exists · why Workspace exists
Public evidence and cloud agents are the same harness.
Eval exists so scores are inspectable—tasks, trajectories, artifacts, and rubric verdicts anyone can open.Workspace exists so people can automate real file work with that harness, and so Raycaster never evaluates work it cannot perform.