Raycaster / evalsTask overviewAPEX-AgentsCategory

APEX-Agents · GPT-5.4 nano · dual

World433_JS_01

2/3Fail

GPT-5.4 nano on APEX-Agents: World433_JS_01 (dual harness). Browse score, rubric, and public trace.

2/3 · Fail
Law
AI Agents for Healthcare and Senior Living Legal Risk
Law World 433

Grader rubric

Criteria verdict

  1. States Yes, Magnolia Gardens is in compliance with Chapter 276 of Title 26 the Texas Administrative Code as to the pet deposit

  2. States that Gregory Johns's dog, Courage, is not a service animal under Chapter 276 of Title 26 of the Texas Administrative Code

  3. States that Magnolia can charge a pet deposit for pets that are not service animals

Prompt excerpt

Task context

Magnolia Gardens has a contract with the Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) to provide services, as an assisted living facility, to DHS clients. Gregory Johns--a disabled DHS client who is in a wheelchair, epileptic, and blind--has recently been admitted to Magnolia Gardens and has been charged a small pet deposit for his dog, Courage. Courage is Mr. Johns' emotional support animal. Is Magnolia Gardens in compliance with Chapter 276 of Title 26 of the Texas Administrative Code in regards to charging Gregory Johns a pet deposit? Reply to me right here with a clear answer, and explain your reasoning.

Response trace

Agent response, tools, files, and edits

Open full trace

On mobile, open the full trace for the best view of the agent response, tool calls, file reads, edits, and grading context.

Open mobile trace