Raycaster/ Eval

APEX-Agents

gpt-5.4-nano on World425_RO_02

2/3Fail
Domain
Law
Category
AI Agents for Employment Law Analysis
Harness
dual

Grader rubric

Criteria verdict

  1. States that the Seller's total liability is $726,000

  2. States that the Seller's remaining liability is $301,000 plus the amount of any prior claims against the escrow account

  3. States that the claim is allowable under Section 11.5(a)

Prompt excerpt

Task context

On 12/1/2028 our client, Summit, informed us they received a claim from Harbor Bridge for failure to disclose a phantom stock plan during the sale transaction we helped them with back in 2025. The claim is for $726,000. Can you please review the stock purchase agreement and see if this is a valid claim or not? And if so, what is Summit's total liability and how much more would they have to pay above the escrow? Give numbers rounded to 000s. Write a short response here. Assume the closing occurred on 11/1/2025 and that the claim is valid in every regard. Use only the stock purchase agreement in your analysis.

Response trace

Agent response, tools, files, and edits

Open full trace

On a phone, the interactive viewer works best full-screen — pick the narrative report or the files & trajectory workspace.

Why Eval exists · why Workspace exists

Public evidence and cloud agents are the same harness.

Eval exists so scores are inspectable—tasks, trajectories, artifacts, and rubric verdicts anyone can open.Workspace exists so people can automate real file work with that harness, and so Raycaster never evaluates work it cannot perform.