APEX-Agents
gpt-5.4-nano on World423_DPM_02
Grader rubric
Criteria verdict
States Yes, the Controller-to-Supervisory Authority Notification Template is compliant with the GDPR notification requirements
States Yes, the Breach & Incident Response Policy is compliant with the GDPR notification requirements
States that no additions are needed to make the Controller-to-Supervisory Authority Notification Template compliant with the GDPR’s notification requirements
States that no additions are needed to make the V.2 Breach & Incident Response Policy compliant with the GDPR’s notification requirements
Prompt excerpt
Task context
Review the Controller-to-Supervisory Authority Notification Template, along with the timing set out in the V.2 Breach & Incident Response Policy, to ensure compliance with the notification requirements of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Draft a message to me here that answers Yes or No as to whether each policy is compliant. If not compliant, propose any necessary additions.
Response trace
Agent response, tools, files, and edits
On a phone, the interactive viewer works best full-screen — pick the narrative report or the files & trajectory workspace.
Why Eval exists · why Workspace exists
Public evidence and cloud agents are the same harness.
Eval exists so scores are inspectable—tasks, trajectories, artifacts, and rubric verdicts anyone can open.Workspace exists so people can automate real file work with that harness, and so Raycaster never evaluates work it cannot perform.