Raycaster/ Eval

APEX-Agents

gpt-5.5 on World423_AW_01

2/3Fail
Domain
Law
Category
AI Agents for Privacy and GDPR Compliance
Harness
dual

Grader rubric

Criteria verdict

  1. States that there is a discrepancy among the documents in relation to the data breach

    Pass
  2. States that the Privileged Assessment identified the instance_region descriptor as a pseudonymous identifier

    Fail
  3. States that a pseudonymous identifier is considered personal data under the GDPR

    Pass

Prompt excerpt

Task context

Our client needs to know if any of that data that was transmitted in the breach is considered personal data under GDPR. Review the four attached incident reports and provide your reply to me with exactly the following: 1) a single sentence conclusion identifying if there are any discrepancies among the documents in relation to the data breach; and 2) 1-2 sentences of analysis as to whether the type of data involved in the breach is considered "personal data" under GDPR.

Response trace

Agent response, tools, files, and edits

Open full trace

On a phone, the interactive viewer works best full-screen — pick the narrative report or the files & trajectory workspace.

Why Eval exists · why Workspace exists

Public evidence and cloud agents are the same harness.

Eval exists so scores are inspectable—tasks, trajectories, artifacts, and rubric verdicts anyone can open.Workspace exists so people can automate real file work with that harness, and so Raycaster never evaluates work it cannot perform.