Raycaster/ Eval

APEX-Agents

gpt-5.5 on World419_el_01

6/10Fail
Domain
Law
Category
AI Agents for Maritime and Environmental Liability
Harness
dual

Grader rubric

Criteria verdict

  1. States yes for Article 2

    Fail
  2. States no for Article 3

    Pass
  3. States no for Article 4

    Pass
  4. States no for Article 5

    Pass
  5. States yes for Article 6

    Pass
  6. States yes for Article 9

    Pass
  7. States no for Article 10

    Fail
  8. States no for Article 11

    Fail
  9. States no for Article 12

    Fail
  10. States no for Article 13

    Pass

Prompt excerpt

Task context

Review Articles 2-6 and 9-13 of the Charter Party Agreement and let me know which ones could be used to create joint liability with or shift liability to the Owner for any oil spills? Provide a yes/no assessment for each Article. Print your response back here.

Response trace

Agent response, tools, files, and edits

Open full trace

On a phone, the interactive viewer works best full-screen — pick the narrative report or the files & trajectory workspace.

Why Eval exists · why Workspace exists

Public evidence and cloud agents are the same harness.

Eval exists so scores are inspectable—tasks, trajectories, artifacts, and rubric verdicts anyone can open.Workspace exists so people can automate real file work with that harness, and so Raycaster never evaluates work it cannot perform.