Raycaster/ Eval

APEX-Agents

gpt-5.5 on World419_DM_02

1/3Fail
Domain
Law
Category
AI Agents for Maritime and Environmental Liability
Harness
dual

Grader rubric

Criteria verdict

  1. States that the maximum potential liability for Star Tankers International Ltd. under the Oil Pollution Act is $56,709,300

    Pass
  2. States that the maximum potential liability for Cooper/Jeffries Energy Corporation under the Oil Pollution Act is $56,709,300

    Fail
  3. States that neither Star Tankers International Ltd. nor Cooper/Jeffries Energy Corporation have greater potential liability under the Oil Pollution Act as their maximum liability is equal

    Fail

Prompt excerpt

Task context

Evaluate the maximum total potential liability for Star Tankers International Ltd. compared to Cooper/Jeffries Energy Corporation under the Oil Pollution Act for the incident with the M/V Red Room. Draft a message to me here, stating which entity has a greater liability if found to be the sole responsible party for the incident with the M/V Red Room. Calculate and include the potential maximum liability for each party. Give the values in 100s. Use the BLPL Claim Summary, the relevant legal authority, and the Hull and Machinery Survey for your analysis.

Response trace

Agent response, tools, files, and edits

Open full trace

On a phone, the interactive viewer works best full-screen — pick the narrative report or the files & trajectory workspace.

Why Eval exists · why Workspace exists

Public evidence and cloud agents are the same harness.

Eval exists so scores are inspectable—tasks, trajectories, artifacts, and rubric verdicts anyone can open.Workspace exists so people can automate real file work with that harness, and so Raycaster never evaluates work it cannot perform.