Raycaster/ Eval

APEX-Agents

gpt-5.5 on World418_EK_01

3/5Fail
Domain
Law
Category
AI Agents for Joint Venture Legal Structuring
Harness
dual

Grader rubric

Criteria verdict

  1. States No, assigning the shipbuilding contract to the JV does not require any other member consents under the JV Operating Agreement

    Pass
  2. States that the assignment of the shipbuilding contract is LNG Shipping's initial capital contribution to the joint venture

    Pass
  3. States that accepting initial capital contributions is not a reserved matter under the Joint Venture Operating Agreement

    Fail
  4. States that accepting initial capital contributions does not require any further member consent under the JV Operating Agreement

    Fail
  5. States that the Joint Venture Operating Agreement does not impose additional member consent requirements for accepting the the assignment of the shipbuilding contract

    Pass

Prompt excerpt

Task context

Does assigning the shipbuilding contract to the JV require any other member consents (under the JV Operating Agreement) that we don't already have? Write out your answer to me here, and give a short reason to justify it.

Response trace

Agent response, tools, files, and edits

Open full trace

On a phone, the interactive viewer works best full-screen — pick the narrative report or the files & trajectory workspace.

Why Eval exists · why Workspace exists

Public evidence and cloud agents are the same harness.

Eval exists so scores are inspectable—tasks, trajectories, artifacts, and rubric verdicts anyone can open.Workspace exists so people can automate real file work with that harness, and so Raycaster never evaluates work it cannot perform.