APEX-Agents
gpt-5.4-nano on world130_HO_05
Grader rubric
Criteria verdict
States that the number of respondents who received any kind of training on digital tools is 1200
States that percentage of respondents rated the training quality as "Excellent- comprehensive and very helpful” is 16%
States that percentage of respondents rated the training quality as "Good- adequate for most needs” is 41%
States that percentage of respondents rated the training quality as “Fair- some gaps or inconsistencies” is 33%
States that percentage of respondents rated the training quality as “Poor - insufficient or unhelpful” is 11%
Prompt excerpt
Task context
Use the v1 version of the survey responses to identify the number of respondents who received any kind of training on digital tools. Of those respondents, return the percentage of respondents for each training quality rating. Reply back here to me.
Response trace
Agent response, tools, files, and edits
On a phone, the interactive viewer works best full-screen — pick the narrative report or the files & trajectory workspace.
Why Eval exists · why Workspace exists
Public evidence and cloud agents are the same harness.
Eval exists so scores are inspectable—tasks, trajectories, artifacts, and rubric verdicts anyone can open.Workspace exists so people can automate real file work with that harness, and so Raycaster never evaluates work it cannot perform.