Raycaster/ Eval

APEX-Agents

Kimi K2 on World 415-CD-02

0/2Fail
Domain
Law
Category
AI Agents for SEC Disclosure Analysis
Harness
dual

Grader rubric

Criteria verdict

  1. States that nothing in Kurtz's statement materially contradicts the disclosure provided in the Form 8-K

  2. States Kurtz statement is not misleading under Rule 10b-5

Prompt excerpt

Task context

Review the following: the statement dated July 19, 2024 from George Kurtz, the Form 8-K from Crowdstrike dated July 19, 2024 and Rule 10b-5. Based solely on these documents, identify any statements made by Kurtz that are clearly and unequivocally misleading under Rule 10b-5. For any problematic statement(s), identify the missing context that is required for them. Reply back to me with your findings as an answer here

Response trace

Agent response, tools, files, and edits

Open full trace

On a phone, the interactive viewer works best full-screen — pick the narrative report or the files & trajectory workspace.

Why Eval exists · why Workspace exists

Public evidence and cloud agents are the same harness.

Eval exists so scores are inspectable—tasks, trajectories, artifacts, and rubric verdicts anyone can open.Workspace exists so people can automate real file work with that harness, and so Raycaster never evaluates work it cannot perform.