Raycaster/ Eval

APEX-Agents

GPT-5.4 on Task vao7e9fb

0/1Fail
Domain
Law
Category
AI Agents for Employment Law Analysis
Harness
dual

Grader rubric

Criteria verdict

  1. States No, the employee's damages would not be covered under BLPL's insurance policy

Prompt excerpt

Task context

One of BLPL's employees developed a long-term illness due to toxin exposure from cleaning up the oil that spilled in the M/V Red Room incident. The employee has sued BLPL for damages. If BLPL is liable for the employee's damages, will this be covered by their insurance policy? Write back your findings with a short reply to me here.

Response trace

Agent response, tools, files, and edits

Open full trace

On a phone, the interactive viewer works best full-screen — pick the narrative report or the files & trajectory workspace.

Why Eval exists · why Workspace exists

Public evidence and cloud agents are the same harness.

Eval exists so scores are inspectable—tasks, trajectories, artifacts, and rubric verdicts anyone can open.Workspace exists so people can automate real file work with that harness, and so Raycaster never evaluates work it cannot perform.