Raycaster/ Eval

APEX-Agents

gpt-5.4-mini on Task p5y453db

0/1Fail
Domain
Law
Category
AI Agents for FDA and Pharma Promotional Compliance
Harness
dual

Grader rubric

Criteria verdict

  1. States that Livyra's proposed campaign does not violate the FDA guidelines on communications with medical professionals

Prompt excerpt

Task context

Livyra has scrapped the "Focus on What Matters" campaign. They intend to replace it with a new campaign advertising to the general population which states normal approved audio messages based on depression treatment in adults but is supplemented with images of happy children hugging their parents. Looking at the guidance from the FDA, "Guidance from FDA on Unapproved Uses.pdf", as well as case law such as US v. Caronia, "US v. Caronia, 703 F. 3d 149 - Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit 2012.pdf", will Livyra be in violation of FDA regulations regarding off-label marketing?

Response trace

Agent response, tools, files, and edits

Open full trace

On a phone, the interactive viewer works best full-screen — pick the narrative report or the files & trajectory workspace.

Why Eval exists · why Workspace exists

Public evidence and cloud agents are the same harness.

Eval exists so scores are inspectable—tasks, trajectories, artifacts, and rubric verdicts anyone can open.Workspace exists so people can automate real file work with that harness, and so Raycaster never evaluates work it cannot perform.