Raycaster/ Eval

APEX-Agents

GPT-5.4 on LawWorld433_NAF_02

0/3Fail
Domain
Law
Category
AI Agents for Healthcare and Senior Living Legal Risk
Harness
dual

Grader rubric

Criteria verdict

  1. States that going to arbitration with the Whitakers is consistent with Mr. Stoker's Litigation Plan

  2. States that the Residency Agreement requires mandatory arbitration in Los Angeles, California

  3. States that participating in arbitration in Texas is not consistent with the Residency Agreement

Prompt excerpt

Task context

The attorney for Thomas Whitaker wants to submit this matter for arbitration in Texas. Reply to me in here, drafting an output explaining whether that would be consistent with Mr. Stoker's Litigation Plan and the Residency Agreement for Thomas Whitaker.

Response trace

Agent response, tools, files, and edits

Open full trace

On a phone, the interactive viewer works best full-screen — pick the narrative report or the files & trajectory workspace.

Why Eval exists · why Workspace exists

Public evidence and cloud agents are the same harness.

Eval exists so scores are inspectable—tasks, trajectories, artifacts, and rubric verdicts anyone can open.Workspace exists so people can automate real file work with that harness, and so Raycaster never evaluates work it cannot perform.