Raycaster/ Eval

APEX-Agents

gpt-5.4-mini on LawWorld433_ANB_01

3/3Pass
Domain
Law
Category
AI Agents for Privacy and GDPR Compliance
Harness
dual

Grader rubric

Criteria verdict

  1. States the last date the Motion to Dismiss can be filed is August 6, 2025

  2. States the breach of contract allegation was first raised in the original complaint

  3. States the original complaint was served on June 7, 2025

Prompt excerpt

Task context

Susan Whitaker has filed three successive Complaints against Magnolia Gardens. The first is the original Complaint, the second Is the First Amended Complaint, and the third is the Second Amended Complaint. Each Complaint was served on the defendant ten days after they were filed. Magnolia Gardens wants to file a Motion to Dismiss the breach of contract allegations in the Complaint. Review the complaints and decide if, under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 91a.3, what is the last day the motion to dismiss can be timely filed? When was the original complaint served? Give me your answer right here.

Response trace

Agent response, tools, files, and edits

Open full trace

On a phone, the interactive viewer works best full-screen — pick the narrative report or the files & trajectory workspace.

Why Eval exists · why Workspace exists

Public evidence and cloud agents are the same harness.

Eval exists so scores are inspectable—tasks, trajectories, artifacts, and rubric verdicts anyone can open.Workspace exists so people can automate real file work with that harness, and so Raycaster never evaluates work it cannot perform.