APEX-Agents
Gemini 3.1 Pro on Analyze Effect of Anti-SLAPP Suit Against BlueLNG on Pre-Suit Discovery
Grader rubric
Criteria verdict
States that the motion to dismiss under Texas anti-SLAPP statute only applies to a "legal action"
States that the petition is a legal action
States that the petition is not based on the shipyard's exercise of a protected right
States that the anti-SLAPP statute does not apply to the pre-suit deposition proceeding
Prompt excerpt
Task context
As counsel to BlueLNG and recently subpoenaed a news reporter under Rule 202 to find out whether he's illegally obtained trade secrets from one of our shipyards. The shipyard filed a motion to dismiss the pre-suit deposition proceeding under Texas's anti-SLAPP statute. Can you take a look at the statute (attached) and let me know whether it's applicable? Give me your reply here.
Response trace
Agent response, tools, files, and edits
On a phone, the interactive viewer works best full-screen — pick the narrative report or the files & trajectory workspace.
Why Eval exists · why Workspace exists
Public evidence and cloud agents are the same harness.
Eval exists so scores are inspectable—tasks, trajectories, artifacts, and rubric verdicts anyone can open.Workspace exists so people can automate real file work with that harness, and so Raycaster never evaluates work it cannot perform.