APEX-Agents · Law
World434_JS_01
APEX-Agents task World434_JS_01 in AI Agents for Real Estate Lease Review. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models — rubric criteria, scores, and public traces.
Task prompt
What the agent was asked to do
Harborview Capital Partners, L.P. ("Harborview") has decided to lease one of the Singapore properties it acquired. The property is 14,000 square feet and is going to be used to sell bicycles and has several administrative offices. Harborview is entering into a 2-year commercial lease agreement with the lessee. Harborview has a S$3.5 million public liability policy on the property. Can Harborview require the lessee to carry S$3.5 million in public liability insurance? Reply back to me here with your view, and explain your reasoning.
Published trajectories
Agent runs on this task
Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.
| Model | Harness | Score | Result | Links |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5.5showcase | dual | 3/4 | Fail | Share pagePublic trace |
| fireworks models Kimi K2 | dual | 4/4 | Pass | Share pagePublic trace |
| Gemini 3 Flash | dual | 4/4 | Pass | Share pagePublic trace |
| Gemini 3.1 Pro | dual | 4/4 | Pass | Share pagePublic trace |
| GPT-5.4 | dual | 4/4 | Pass | Share pagePublic trace |
| GPT-5.4 mini | dual | 4/4 | Pass | Share pagePublic trace |
| GPT-5.4 nano | dual | 3/4 | Fail | Share pagePublic trace |
Grading rubric
Criteria and grader verdict (showcase run)
States that Harbor View Capital Partners, L.P. cannot require the lessee to carry S$3.5 million in public liability insurance
PassEvidence: TEXT_RESPONSE states, “View: No… Harborview should not require the lessee to carry S$3.5 million in public liability insurance” and “So Harborview should not require S$3.5 million in the lease.” Assessment: The criterion asks whether it states Harborview cannot require S$3.5 million; pass because the response clearly says no/cannot require that amount.
States that the lease is a qualifying lease under the Singapore Code of Conduct because it exceeds one year and involves premises used primarily for retail sale of goods
PassEvidence: TEXT_RESPONSE states, “This appears to be a qualifying retail lease,” because “premises will be used to sell bicycles… retail sale of goods” and “The lease term is 2 years, exceeding the one-year threshold.” Assessment: The criterion requires stating the lease is qualifying because it exceeds one year and is primarily retail sale of goods; pass.
States that the Code of Conduct limits a tenant’s required public liability insurance coverage to S$3 million
PassEvidence: TEXT_RESPONSE states, “The public-liability insurance cap is the lower of S$3 million and the landlord’s own public-liability limit” and “the applicable cap is… S$3 million.” Assessment: The criterion asks whether it states the Code limits required tenant public liability coverage to S$3 million; pass.
States that the Code of Conduct provision governing tenant public liability insurance is mandatory and cannot be overridden by contractual agreement
FailEvidence: TEXT_RESPONSE says the Code applies and quotes that landlord and tenant “must ensure that the lease agreement… complies with the leasing principles,” and that the “lease must not require” more than the cap. It does not expressly state the tenant public liability insurance provision is mandatory and cannot be overridden by contractual agreement. Assessment: The criterion specifically requires stating mandatory/non-overridable by contract; fail because that point is not clearly conveyed.