Raycaster / evalsBack to AI Agents for Real Estate Lease Review

APEX-Agents · Law

World434_DPM_01

3/3Pass

APEX-Agents task World434_DPM_01 in AI Agents for Real Estate Lease Review. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models — rubric criteria, scores, and public traces.

AI Agents for Real Estate Lease ReviewLaw World 434Dual harnessGrader: rubric
task_85f48fa8ecc04d9eb5a56a6e95aa3a88
Law World 434
message_in_console
7 models · dual config

Task prompt

What the agent was asked to do

Review the URA Land Search Report, based on the relevant provision of the Planning Act, what is the potential maximum financial penalty regarding TOP/2018/04576 as of January 1, 2025? Assume that the sentence "[i]f the facility has been operating as self-storage since 2020 without proper approval, the cumulative exposure could be significant," is referencing January 1, 2020. Write back to me with your assessment in here.

Published trajectories

Agent runs on this task

Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.

ModelHarnessScoreResultLinks
GPT-5.5showcasedual3/3Pass
fireworks models Kimi K2dual2/3Fail
Gemini 3 Flashdual3/3Pass
Gemini 3.1 Produal3/3Pass
GPT-5.4dual3/3Pass
GPT-5.4 minidual3/3Pass
GPT-5.4 nanodual2/3Fail

Grading rubric

Criteria and grader verdict (showcase run)

  1. States that the penalty on conviction is a fine not exceeding S$200,000

    Pass

    Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE states the offence is punishable by “a fine not exceeding $200,000” and later “Legally supportable exposure… S$200,000 maximum financial penalty.” Assessment: Meets criterion “States that the penalty on conviction is a fine not exceeding S$200,000.”

  2. States that after conviction, a further fine not exceeding $10,000 applies for each day or part of a day during which the offence continues

    Pass

    Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE says “the continuing daily fine is post-conviction only” and quotes “a further fine not exceeding $10,000 for every day or part of a day during which the offence continues after conviction.” Assessment: Meets criterion “States that after conviction, a further fine not exceeding $10,000 applies for each day or part of a day during which the offence continues.”

  3. States that the potential maximum penalty as of January 1, 2025 is $200,000

    Pass

    Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE opens with “The maximum financial penalty is S$200,000 as of January 1, 2025” and bottom line repeats “maximum statutory financial penalty as of January 1, 2025 is S$200,000.” Assessment: Meets criterion “States that the potential maximum penalty as of January 1, 2025 is $200,000.”