Raycaster/ Eval

APEX-Agents · Law

World423_JS_01

Best published5/5Pass

APEX-Agents task World423_JS_01 in AI Agents for Privacy and GDPR Compliance. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models, scores, and public traces.

AI Agents for Privacy and GDPR ComplianceLaw World 423Dual harnessGrader: rubric
task_afcdcb040d924d4289b2a739e6ac4c49
Law World 423
message_in_console
7 models · dual config

Task prompt

What the agent was asked to do

Let's assess the applicability of the statement of "[t[hese data elements constitute personal data for GDPR purposes because they relate to identifiable users, even though no directly identifying attributes (e.g., names or email addresses) were included," to BlueQuill. This statement is located in the Analytics Module Supervisory Document. Assess whether BlueQuill actually processed personal data under the GDPR when it received the data transfer from the "Diagnostics Analytics Module". BlueQuill claims it did not have access to data that would enable BlueQuill to identify the natural person linked to each user ID. Draft your answer as a message, reply to me in here -- and explain your reasoning.

Published trajectories

Agent runs on this task

Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.

ModelHarnessScoreResultLinks
Gemini 3 Flashdual5/5Pass
fireworks models Kimi K2dual4/5Fail
GPT-5.4dual4/5Fail
Gemini 3.1 Produal3/5Fail
GPT-5.4 minidual3/5Fail
GPT-5.4 nanodual3/5Fail
GPT-5.5dual3/5Fail

Grading rubric

Rubric criteria

Runs are graded against these criteria. Open a run for model-specific verdicts.

  1. States that under the GDPR, for information to be personal data, it must relate to a natural person

  2. States No, BlueQuill did not process personal data under the GDPR

  3. States that under the GDPR, for information to be personal data, the natural person must be identifiable

  4. States that a recipient does not actually process personal data if it does not have reasonable means to identify a natural person from the pseudonymized data

  5. States that BlueQuill did not have access to the data that would enable it to identify the natural person linked to the pseudonymized data