Raycaster / evalsBack to AI Agents for Maritime and Environmental Liability

APEX-Agents · Law

World419_AH_02

0/1Fail

APEX-Agents task World419_AH_02 in AI Agents for Maritime and Environmental Liability. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models — rubric criteria, scores, and public traces.

AI Agents for Maritime and Environmental LiabilityLaw World 419Dual harnessGrader: rubric
task_a28445db856341ecb5c47d86e488b3d4
Law World 419
message_in_console
7 models · dual config

Task prompt

What the agent was asked to do

The containment and remediation efforts for the crude oil spill were successful, and our total liability was $1.5 million, which we claimed under our insurance. 6 months after the spill, we were contacted by a fish nursery downstream of the spill. They claim that the spill interfered with their operations, and are seeking $150,000 in damages. Can we claim this under our insurance? Tell me the answer in here.

Published trajectories

Agent runs on this task

Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.

ModelHarnessScoreResultLinks
GPT-5.5showcasedual0/1Fail
fireworks models Kimi K2dual0/1Fail
Gemini 3 Flashdual0/1Fail
Gemini 3.1 Produal0/1Fail
GPT-5.4dual0/1Fail
GPT-5.4 minidual0/1Fail
GPT-5.4 nanodual0/1Fail

Grading rubric

Criteria and grader verdict (showcase run)

  1. States No, the $150,000 loss cannot be claimed under the policy

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> says, “Yes — you should tender/report the fish nursery’s $150,000 demand to the insurer as a related pollution claim” and “Bottom line: claim it/report it immediately.” Assessment: The criterion requires that the response “States No, the $150,000 loss cannot be claimed under the policy.” The response states the opposite, so this fails.