APEX-Agents · Law

World418_BA_01

2/10Fail

APEX-Agents task World418_BA_01 in AI Agents for Joint Venture Legal Structuring. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models — rubric criteria, scores, and public traces.

AI Agents for Joint Venture Legal StructuringLaw World 418Dual harnessGrader: rubric

Task IDtask_9509d6400e0c4e67a2222316744e7ded

WorldLaw World 418

Expected outputmessage_in_console

Published runs6 models · dual config

Task prompt

What the agent was asked to do

Does any agreement between us and BlueAnchor create any non-disclosure obligations preventing our owner from publicly announcing the deal? Write me a short reply back that I can review and send.

Published trajectories

Agent runs on this task

Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.

Model	Harness	Score	Result	Links
GPT-5.5showcase	dual	2/10	Fail	Share page Public trace
fireworks models Kimi K2	dual	0/10	Fail	Share page Public trace
Gemini 3.1 Pro	dual	2/10	Fail	Share page Public trace
GPT-5.4	dual	1/10	Fail	Share page Public trace
GPT-5.4 mini	dual	0/10	Fail	Share page Public trace
GPT-5.4 nano	dual	2/10	Fail	Share page Public trace

Grading rubric

Criteria and grader verdict (showcase run)

States that the Assignment Agreement includes a confidentiality clause
Fail
Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE says, “I don’t see a current agreement with BlueAnchor that independently prohibits a high-level public announcement” and references “Earlier drafts” and no signed NDA, but does not mention an Assignment Agreement. Assessment: The criterion requires stating that the Assignment Agreement includes a confidentiality clause; fail because the response does not state this.
States that the scope of the Assignment Agreement's confidentiality clause is limited to information concerning the assignment of the Shipbuilding Contract
Fail
Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE does not mention the Assignment Agreement or any clause limited to assignment of the Shipbuilding Contract. It only says announcements should avoid “non-public terms, economics, financing details, shipbuilding/technical information.” Assessment: The criterion requires the specific limited scope of the Assignment Agreement’s confidentiality clause; fail.
States that the Shipbuilding Contract includes a confidentiality clause
Fail
Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE mentions “shipbuilding/technical information” as something to avoid, but does not state that the Shipbuilding Contract includes a confidentiality clause. Assessment: The criterion requires stating the Shipbuilding Contract includes a confidentiality clause; fail.
States that the scope of the Shipbuilding Contract's confidentiality clause is limited to all of the following: (1) technical information and (2) commercial terms of the Shipbuilding Contract
Fail
Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE advises avoiding “non-public terms, economics, financing details, shipbuilding/technical information,” but does not identify the Shipbuilding Contract’s confidentiality clause or state its scope is limited to both technical information and commercial terms of that contract. Assessment: The criterion requires all specified scope elements tied to the Shipbuilding Contract; fail.
States that LNG Shipping Inc. is no longer bound by the Shipbuilding Contract's confidentiality clause
Fail
Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE says “I don’t see a current agreement with BlueAnchor that independently prohibits a high-level public announcement,” but does not mention LNG Shipping Inc. being no longer bound by the Shipbuilding Contract’s confidentiality clause. Assessment: The criterion requires that specific statement; fail.
States that the Ship Management Agreement includes a confidentiality clause
Fail
Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE does not mention a Ship Management Agreement. Assessment: The criterion requires stating that the Ship Management Agreement includes a confidentiality clause; fail.
States that the scope of the Ship Management Agreement’s confidentiality clause is limited to information relating to the management of carrier vessels for the BlueLNG JV LLC
Fail
Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE does not mention the Ship Management Agreement or information relating to management of carrier vessels for BlueLNG JV LLC. Assessment: The criterion requires the specific scope of that agreement’s confidentiality clause; fail.
States that all of the following agreements do not contain confidentiality obligations: (1) the Joint Venture Agreement and (2) the Operating Agreement
Fail
Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE says “Earlier drafts did include a prior-approval requirement for public announcements, but I did not see that language in the final/execution-version documents,” but does not specifically identify both the Joint Venture Agreement and Operating Agreement as lacking confidentiality obligations. Assessment: The criterion requires stating both agreements do not contain confidentiality obligations; fail.
States that LNG Shipping does not have an obligation to keep confidential the existence of the deal to set up BlueLNG JV
Pass
Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE states, “I don’t see a current agreement with BlueAnchor that independently prohibits a high-level public announcement of the deal.” Assessment: This clearly conveys that LNG Shipping does not have an obligation to keep confidential the existence of the deal to set up BlueLNG JV; pass.
States that the owner of LNG Shipping can publicly announce the deal
Pass
Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE states there is no current agreement that “independently prohibits a high-level public announcement of the deal,” while advising any announcement should “stay high-level” and be coordinated as a courtesy. Assessment: The criterion requires stating the owner of LNG Shipping can publicly announce the deal; this is conveyed with appropriate qualifications; pass.