Raycaster/ Eval

APEX-Agents · Law

World416_DM_01

Best published0/3Fail

APEX-Agents task World416_DM_01 in AI Agents for Tariff and Trade Law Analysis. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models, scores, and public traces.

AI Agents for Tariff and Trade Law AnalysisLaw World 416Dual harnessGrader: rubric
task_68bcf4d7fc5045b58045dc9f2f23ce5c
Law World 416
message_in_console
7 models · dual config

Task prompt

What the agent was asked to do

Due to a riot occurring in response to an Executive Order that resulted in the closure of its factories, TAC sought relief from performance under the force majeure section of the Master Supply Agreement. Citing the attached case, Buyer asserts that TAC is not excused from performance. Is Buyer correct? Provide your response in here with the following: "Yes/No"; and brief explanation.

Published trajectories

Agent runs on this task

Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.

ModelHarnessScoreResultLinks
fireworks models Kimi K2dual0/3Fail
Gemini 3 Flashdual0/3Fail
Gemini 3.1 Produal0/3Fail
GPT-5.4dual0/3Fail
GPT-5.4 minidual0/3Fail
GPT-5.4 nanodual0/3Fail
GPT-5.5dual0/3Fail

Grading rubric

Rubric criteria

Runs are graded against these criteria. Open a run for model-specific verdicts.

  1. States that the language in Section 11 (Force Majeure) of the Master Supply Agreement Template 1 does not need to be updated

  2. States that "government actions" in the Force Majeure section of the Master Supply Agreement Template 1 would cover the type of government executive order that was at issue in Vance v. Diversified Invs

  3. States that no changes to the Force Majeure section are necessary