Raycaster / evalsBack to AI Agents for M&A Legal Due Diligence

APEX-Agents · Investment Banking

World224_JR_Task1

3/3Pass

APEX-Agents task World224_JR_Task1 in AI Agents for M&A Legal Due Diligence. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models — rubric criteria, scores, and public traces.

AI Agents for M&A Legal Due DiligenceInvestment Banking World 224Dual harnessGrader: rubric
task_a35779389b75499082177b8b8e771133
Investment Banking World 224
edit_existing_sheet
4 models · dual config

Task prompt

What the agent was asked to do

Run a single downside scenario where all modeled sensitivity factors receive a 20% shock, in the direction that would adversely impact IRR. What would the new IRR & Sponsor Equity Value be? Use the LBO model to answer. In the operating assumptions, update the sensitivity shocks of the major business drivers, including: a) -20% 'Growth rate scale', total revenue growth for Elastic for years 1-5 b) 20% 'Customer acquisition costs', total sales and marketing costs for years 1-5 for Elastic c) 20% 'R&D cost', the costs for research and development that Elastic is expected to pay from year 1 to 5 in the future d) 20% 'Debt costs', the interest costs that Elastic would have to pay e) -20% 'EBITDA multiple', the exit multiple that is used in determining the exit valuation Output, in a NEW tab in the existing LBO model, values for “IRR (All factors shocked by 20%)” and “Sponsor Equity Value (All factors shocked by 20%)”. Round all values to two decimal places, and display monetary values in millions ($m). I also want you to give an assessment of whether further analysis is required, based on whether the downside loses money.

Published trajectories

Agent runs on this task

Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.

ModelHarnessScoreResultLinks
GPT-5.5showcasedual3/3Pass
Gemini 3.1 Produal0/3Fail
GPT-5.4 minidual3/3Pass
GPT-5.4 nanodual1/3Fail

Grading rubric

Criteria and grader verdict (showcase run)

  1. States that the IRR (with all factors shocked by 20%) is -2.36%

    Pass

    Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE table states “IRR (All factors shocked by 20%) | -2.36%”. Assessment: Criterion asks whether it states the IRR is -2.36%; pass because the response clearly provides that exact value.

  2. States that the Sponsor Equity Value (with all factors shocked by 20%) is $10,008.02m

    Pass

    Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE table states “Sponsor Equity Value (All factors shocked by 20%) | $10,008.02m”. Assessment: Criterion asks whether it states Sponsor Equity Value is $10,008.02m; pass because the response clearly provides that exact monetary value in millions.

  3. States that given the IRR assessment for all factors shocked by 20%, extra analysis is required

    Pass

    Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE says “Assessment: further analysis is required” and explains the downside “loses money” with “negative IRR.” Assessment: Criterion asks whether it states extra analysis is required given the IRR assessment; pass because the response explicitly states further analysis is required.