APEX-Agents · Management Consulting

World130_Al-Zhoheir_Hajim_5

3/10Fail

APEX-Agents task World130_Al-Zhoheir_Hajim_5 in AI Agents for Commercial Contract Risk. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models — rubric criteria, scores, and public traces.

AI Agents for Commercial Contract RiskManagement Consulting World 130Dual harnessGrader: rubric

Task IDtask_5df3da6f8f5c459484670772c82f6941

WorldManagement Consulting World 130

Expected outputmessage_in_console

Published runs5 models · dual config

Task prompt

What the agent was asked to do

Identify the top five technology investments from the Aptean report with the largest positive difference in percentage revenue growth between users and non-users. Include only investments that the report explicitly identifies as either top technology investments to date or top investments planned for 2024. Next, assume that Harfeast will deploy all five of these top initiatives at every plant location, except for its vegetable-heavy processing locations, which will only deploy the top two. Use the resulting percentage revenue impact to project Harfeast's total 2024 unit sales for each location after investing in the initiatives. For this projection, assume the unit sales price remains constant from 2023 to 2024, and that the calculated revenue impact is consistent across all product lines within each plant. Finally, using the calculated 2024 unit sales, determine the expected 2024 total revenue (in $) for each plant location, incorporating a 15% unit price increase for all canned vegetables, a 10% unit price increase for condiments produced at the Rockford, Illinois location, and a 5% unit price increase for all other condiments and sauces across the remaining locations. Round all final numerical values to the nearest whole number. Return answers directly in here.

Published trajectories

Agent runs on this task

Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.

Model	Harness	Score	Result	Links
GPT-5.5showcase	dual	3/10	Fail	Share page Public trace
Gemini 3.1 Pro	dual	3/10	Fail	Share page Public trace
GPT-5.4	dual	3/10	Fail	Share page Public trace
GPT-5.4 mini	dual	4/10	Fail	Share page Public trace
GPT-5.4 nano	dual	4/10	Fail	Share page Public trace

Grading rubric

Criteria and grader verdict (showcase run)

States that the unit sales for Cedar Rapids, Iowa Plant after deploying the initiatives is 19,057,500
Pass
Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states for "Cedar Rapids, Iowa Plant" the "Projected 2024 total unit sales" is "19,057,500". Assessment: Criterion asks whether it states Cedar Rapids unit sales after deploying initiatives is 19,057,500; pass because the stated value matches exactly.
States that the unit sales for Rockford, Illinois Plant after deploying the initiatives is 23,782,500
Pass
Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states for "Rockford, Illinois Plant" the "Projected 2024 total unit sales" is "23,782,500". Assessment: Criterion asks whether it states Rockford unit sales after deploying initiatives is 23,782,500; pass because the stated value matches exactly.
States that the unit sales for Madison, Wisconsin Plant after deploying the initiatives is 5,407,500
Fail
Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states for "Madison, Wisconsin Plant" the "Projected 2024 total unit sales" is "5,711,350". Assessment: Criterion asks whether it states Madison unit sales is 5,407,500; fail because the response gives a different value.
States that the unit sales for Toledo, Ohio Plant after deploying the initiatives is 5,643,750
Fail
Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states for "Toledo, Ohio Plant" the "Projected 2024 total unit sales" is "5,960,875". Assessment: Criterion asks whether it states Toledo unit sales is 5,643,750; fail because the response gives a different value.
States that the unit sales for Kalamazoo, Michigan Plant after deploying the initiatives is 7,386,750
Fail
Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states for "Kalamazoo, Michigan Plant" the "Projected 2024 total unit sales" is "7,801,815". Assessment: Criterion asks whether it states Kalamazoo unit sales is 7,386,750; fail because the response gives a different value.
States that the 2024 Revised Projected Sales for Cedar Rapids, Iowa Plant is $58,918,125
Pass
Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states for "Cedar Rapids, Iowa Plant" the "Expected 2024 total revenue" is "$58,918,125". Assessment: Criterion asks whether it states the 2024 Revised Projected Sales for Cedar Rapids is $58,918,125; pass because the stated value matches exactly.
States that the Revised 2024 Projected Sales for Rockford, Illinois Plant is $74,166,750
Fail
Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states for "Rockford, Illinois Plant" the "Expected 2024 total revenue" is "$73,836,000". Assessment: Criterion asks whether it states Rockford revised 2024 projected sales is $74,166,750; fail because the response gives a different value.
States that the Revised 2024 Projected Sales for Madison, Wisconsin Plant is $32,368,875
Fail
Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states for "Madison, Wisconsin Plant" the "Expected 2024 total revenue" is "$34,187,698". Assessment: Criterion asks whether it states Madison revised 2024 projected sales is $32,368,875; fail because the response gives a different value.
States that the Revised 2024 Projected Sales for Toledo, Ohio Plant is $38,713,500
Fail
Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states for "Toledo, Ohio Plant" the "Expected 2024 total revenue" is "$40,888,830". Assessment: Criterion asks whether it states Toledo revised 2024 projected sales is $38,713,500; fail because the response gives a different value.
States that the Revised 2024 Projected Sales for Kalamazoo, Michigan Plant is $44,457,000
Fail
Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states for "Kalamazoo, Michigan Plant" the "Expected 2024 total revenue" is "$46,955,060". Assessment: Criterion asks whether it states Kalamazoo revised 2024 projected sales is $44,457,000; fail because the response gives a different value.