Raycaster / evalsBack to AI Agents for Comparable Company Analysis

APEX-Agents · Management Consulting

World130_Al-Zhoheir_Hajim_3

2/6Fail

APEX-Agents task World130_Al-Zhoheir_Hajim_3 in AI Agents for Comparable Company Analysis. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models — rubric criteria, scores, and public traces.

AI Agents for Comparable Company AnalysisManagement Consulting World 130Dual harnessGrader: rubric
task_88469a82ab624b0084d2381fbaeb38d1
Management Consulting World 130
message_in_console
5 models · dual config

Task prompt

What the agent was asked to do

Can you calculate the total labor variance in hours (favorable should be positive) and dollars for the Illinois and Wisconsin plants? A positive variance should mean that Total Actual Hours are less than Total Standard Hours. You can use the median wage for All Occupations in the food manufacturing industry in the attached file to convert from hours to dollars. Also, please give me the straight average of the Productivity Index (Standard Labor Hours per Ton divided by Actual Labor Hours Per Ton) for each location. Round the final answers to the nearest hundredth. Provide all your answers directly as a reply to me here. Use the plant-level equipment data by location for the analysis. Also, per client, the total Standard Hours shall be based on Actual Throughput Tons and the Standard Labor Hours per Ton.

Published trajectories

Agent runs on this task

Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.

ModelHarnessScoreResultLinks
GPT-5.5showcasedual2/6Fail
Gemini 3.1 Produal2/6Fail
GPT-5.4dual2/6Fail
GPT-5.4 minidual2/6Fail
GPT-5.4 nanodual2/6Fail

Grading rubric

Criteria and grader verdict (showcase run)

  1. States that the Labor Efficiency Variance (Hours) for Rockford, Illinois Plant is 2,739.84 hours

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table lists Rockford, Illinois Plant Labor Variance (Hours) as "-2,694.94". Assessment: Criterion requires stating the Labor Efficiency Variance (Hours) for Rockford is 2,739.84 hours; the response gives a different value and sign, so fail.

  2. States that the Labor Efficiency Variance (Hours) for Madison, Wisconsin Plant is 2,637.45 hours

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table lists Madison, Wisconsin Plant Labor Variance (Hours) as "-2,632.06". Assessment: Criterion requires stating the Labor Efficiency Variance (Hours) for Madison is 2,637.45 hours; the response gives a different value and sign, so fail.

  3. States that the Labor Cost Variance (dollars) for Rockford, Illinois Plant is $54,111.83

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table lists Rockford Labor Variance ($) as "-$53,224.99". Assessment: Criterion requires stating the Labor Cost Variance for Rockford is $54,111.83; the response gives a different dollar amount and sign, so fail.

  4. States that the Labor Cost Variance (dollars) for Madison, Wisconsin Plant is $52,089.63

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table lists Madison Labor Variance ($) as "-$51,983.13". Assessment: Criterion requires stating the Labor Cost Variance for Madison is $52,089.63; the response gives a different dollar amount and sign, so fail.

  5. States that the Productivity Index for Rockford, Illinois Plant is 0.94

    Pass

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table lists Rockford Straight Avg. Productivity Index as "0.94". Assessment: Criterion requires stating the Productivity Index for Rockford is 0.94; the response matches, so pass.

  6. States that the Productivity Index for Madison, Wisconsin Plant is 0.94

    Pass

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table lists Madison Straight Avg. Productivity Index as "0.94". Assessment: Criterion requires stating the Productivity Index for Madison is 0.94; the response matches, so pass.