APEX-Agents · Management Consulting
World130_Al-Zhoheir_Hajim_1
APEX-Agents task World130_Al-Zhoheir_Hajim_1 in AI Agents for Digital Transformation. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models — rubric criteria, scores, and public traces.
Task prompt
What the agent was asked to do
1. Give me the total labor cost for each plant location. 2. Give me the efficiency gains for each plant location. West North Central division plant locations only have a 10% annual efficiency gain from labor cost. For other locations, the efficiency gain is 20%. However, the efficiency gain is 5% for non-unionized production supervisors no matter where they are located. 3. Give me the forecasted increase in annual labor cost as a result of union demand. All union members in the East North Central division plant locations other than production supervisors are demanding a 5% increase in annual pay. The rest of the union members in all locations are asking for an 8% increase in annual pay. Write your answers here with everything I requested, rounded to the nearest dollar. Ignore any plants in Ohio and Michigan for all questions.
Published trajectories
Agent runs on this task
Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.
| Model | Harness | Score | Result | Links |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5.5showcase | dual | 0/9 | Fail | Share pagePublic trace |
| Gemini 3.1 Pro | dual | 3/9 | Fail | Share pagePublic trace |
| GPT-5.4 | dual | 0/9 | Fail | Share pagePublic trace |
| GPT-5.4 mini | dual | 3/9 | Fail | Share pagePublic trace |
| GPT-5.4 nano | dual | 3/9 | Fail | Share pagePublic trace |
Grading rubric
Criteria and grader verdict (showcase run)
States that the Total Annual Labor Cost ($) for Rockford, Illinois Plant is $303,760
FailEvidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states Rockford total labor cost is "$1,036,465". Assessment: Criterion requires stating Rockford total annual labor cost is $303,760; fail because the stated amount differs.
States that the Total Annual Labor Cost ($) for Madison, Wisconsin Plant is $402,330
FailEvidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states Madison total labor cost is "$824,662". Assessment: Criterion requires stating Madison total annual labor cost is $402,330; fail because the stated amount differs.
States that the Total Annual Labor Cost ($) for Cedar Rapids, Iowa Plant is $360,400
FailEvidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states Cedar Rapids total labor cost is "$824,865". Assessment: Criterion requires stating Cedar Rapids total annual labor cost is $360,400; fail because the stated amount differs.
States that the Efficiency Gains ($) for Rockford, Illinois Plant is $60,752
FailEvidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states Rockford efficiency gains are "$207,293". Assessment: Criterion requires stating Rockford efficiency gains are $60,752; fail because the stated amount differs.
States that the Efficiency Gains ($) for Madison, Wisconsin Plant is $80,466
FailEvidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states Madison efficiency gains are "$164,932". Assessment: Criterion requires stating Madison efficiency gains are $80,466; fail because the stated amount differs.
States that the Efficiency Gains ($) for Cedar Rapids, Iowa Plant is $40,151
FailEvidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states Cedar Rapids efficiency gains are "$82,486". Assessment: Criterion requires stating Cedar Rapids efficiency gains are $40,151; fail because the stated amount differs.
States that the Total Forecasted Labor Cost Increase from Union Demand ($) for Rockford, Illinois Plant is $13,122
FailEvidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states Rockford forecasted increase from union demand is "$41,836". Assessment: Criterion requires stating Rockford forecasted increase is $13,122; fail because the stated amount differs.
States that the Total Forecasted Labor Cost Increase from Union Demand ($) for Madison, Wisconsin Plant is $5,793
FailEvidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states Madison forecasted increase from union demand is "$14,165". Assessment: Criterion requires stating Madison forecasted increase is $5,793; fail because the stated amount differs.
States that the Total Forecasted Labor Cost Increase from Union Demand ($) for Cedar Rapids, Iowa Plant is $6,346
FailEvidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states Cedar Rapids forecasted increase from union demand is "$27,546". Assessment: Criterion requires stating Cedar Rapids forecasted increase is $6,346; fail because the stated amount differs.