Raycaster / evalsBack to AI Agents for Joint Venture Legal Structuring

APEX-Agents · Law

World_418_APA_01

1/10Fail

APEX-Agents task World_418_APA_01 in AI Agents for Joint Venture Legal Structuring. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models — rubric criteria, scores, and public traces.

AI Agents for Joint Venture Legal StructuringLaw World 418Dual harnessGrader: rubric
task_8fb97fca07244d6f843a9a9328084b76
Law World 418
message_in_console
7 models · dual config

Task prompt

What the agent was asked to do

BlueAnchor wants to get the JV Agreement signed today. Can you send me back a message with a list of items that need to be added, changed, or removed to prepare a final execution version? Do not take into consideration the following: (1) lack of definition for any capitalized terms, (2) wrong cross references, and (3) unspecified Trigger Event/Date.

Published trajectories

Agent runs on this task

Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.

ModelHarnessScoreResultLinks
GPT-5.5showcasedual1/10Fail
fireworks models Kimi K2dual0/10Fail
Gemini 3 Flashdual1/10Fail
Gemini 3.1 Produal1/10Fail
GPT-5.4dual0/10Fail
GPT-5.4 minidual1/10Fail
GPT-5.4 nanodual1/10Fail

Grading rubric

Criteria and grader verdict (showcase run)

  1. States that preparing the final JV Agreement requires changing "Section 5" to "Section 4"

    Fail

    Evidence: The response says it “excluded ... cross-reference issues” and lists general governance/economics cleanup, but contains no mention of changing “Section 5” to “Section 4.” Assessment: Criterion requires stating this specific change; fail.

  2. States that preparing the final JV Agreement requires removing "(e)" from Section 5.2 (Meetings of the Board)

    Fail

    Evidence: The response mentions reconciling “governance mechanics” and “Board composition, quorum,” but does not mention Section 5.2 or removing “(e)” from Meetings of the Board. Assessment: Criterion requires that specific removal; fail.

  3. States that preparing the final JV Agreement requires removing "(c)" from Section 5.3 (Authority of the Board)

    Fail

    Evidence: The response includes broad Board authority/governance cleanup, but no text about Section 5.3 or removing “(c)” from Authority of the Board. Assessment: Criterion requires this specific item; fail.

  4. States that preparing the final JV Agreement requires changing "Section 8" to "Section 5"

    Fail

    Evidence: The response says it excluded “cross-reference issues” and never states that “Section 8” should be changed to “Section 5.” Assessment: Criterion requires stating this specific change; fail.

  5. States that preparing the final JV Agreement requires changing "Section 10" to "Section 6"

    Fail

    Evidence: The response contains no mention of changing “Section 10” to “Section 6”; it instead says cross-reference cleanup was excluded. Assessment: Criterion requires the specific change; fail.

  6. States that preparing the final JV Agreement requires changing "Section 13" to "Section 7"

    Fail

    Evidence: The response contains no mention of changing “Section 13” to “Section 7”; it explicitly notes cross-reference issues were excluded. Assessment: Criterion requires this specific change; fail.

  7. States that preparing the final JV Agreement requires removing "13.3 Reports" from Section 13 (Books, Records and Reporting)

    Fail

    Evidence: The response does not mention “13.3 Reports” or removing it from Section 13. It instead suggests adding or completing “tax reporting/K-1 delivery” and “audit/information rights.” Assessment: Criterion requires stating removal of “13.3 Reports”; fail.

  8. States that preparing the final JV Agreement requires removing "(b) Quarterly Reports" from Section 13 (Books, Records and Reporting)

    Fail

    Evidence: The response does not mention “(b) Quarterly Reports” or removing it from Section 13. Assessment: Criterion requires that specific removal; fail.

  9. States that preparing the final JV Agreement requires changing "Section 14" to "Section 8"

    Fail

    Evidence: The response contains no mention of changing “Section 14” to “Section 8”; it says cross-reference cleanup was excluded. Assessment: Criterion requires this specific change; fail.

  10. States that preparing the final JV Agreement requires adding the name of BlueLNG JV LLC’s CEO in the signature block

    Pass

    Evidence: The response states, “Add final signature block information, including the Company signatory name,” and separately says to remove placeholders “including `[CEO Name]`.” Assessment: This clearly conveys that the CEO/signatory name placeholder in the signature block needs to be completed, satisfying the criterion despite not naming BlueLNG JV LLC verbatim; pass.