Raycaster / evalsBack to AI Agents for M&A Legal Due Diligence

APEX-Agents · Investment Banking

World_223_IL_03

0/4Fail

APEX-Agents task World_223_IL_03 in AI Agents for M&A Legal Due Diligence. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models — rubric criteria, scores, and public traces.

AI Agents for M&A Legal Due DiligenceInvestment Banking World 223Dual harnessGrader: rubric
task_a8d6687624d948efaf37a4c4fa366af4
Investment Banking World 223
message_in_console
4 models · dual config

Task prompt

What the agent was asked to do

Perform a value-creation analysis based on scenario 1 using the accretion dilution model to assess whether Scenario 1 creates or destroys value for 3M Shareholders. Assumptions: 1. 3M Levered Beta is 1.15 2. Risk free rate is 4.00% 3. Equity risk premium is 5.50% 4. Calculate cost of equity using CAPM: Risk-free rate + Beta*Equity Risk Premium 5. Implied Return = SOLV Net Income/Purchase Price Paid 6. Assume Spread is calculated by Implied Return - WACC 7. For PF WACC, use 3M's existing cost of debt from Scenario 1 and assume the incremental acquisition debt carries a 10.00% interest rate (consistent with Scenario 1 assumptions). Print the output here. Format all final percentages to two decimal places.

Published trajectories

Agent runs on this task

Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.

ModelHarnessScoreResultLinks
GPT-5.5showcasedual0/4Fail
Gemini 3.1 Produal0/4Fail
GPT-5.4 minidual0/4Fail
GPT-5.4 nanodual0/4Fail

Grading rubric

Criteria and grader verdict (showcase run)

  1. States that Base 3M WACC is 9.37%

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table lists “PF WACC | 9.17%” and does not include a Base 3M WACC line. Assessment: The criterion requires stating “Base 3M WACC is 9.37%”; this is absent, so fail.

  2. States that the Base Spread is -0.84%

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table lists “Spread: Implied Return - PF WACC | -0.64%” and the conclusion repeats “negative spread of -0.64%.” Assessment: The criterion requires stating “the Base Spread is -0.84%”; no Base Spread is stated and the only spread given is different, so fail.

  3. States that PF 3M WACC is 9.53%

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states “PF WACC | 9.17%.” Assessment: The criterion requires stating “PF 3M WACC is 9.53%”; the response states 9.17% instead, so fail.

  4. States that the PF Spread is -1.01%

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states “Spread: Implied Return - PF WACC | -0.64%” and conclusion says “producing a negative spread of -0.64%.” Assessment: The criterion requires stating “the PF Spread is -1.01%”; the response states -0.64% instead, so fail.