APEX-Agents · Management Consulting

World 134 Nancy Task 05

0/6Fail

APEX-Agents task World 134 Nancy Task 05 in AI Agents for Tax Due Diligence. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models — rubric criteria, scores, and public traces.

AI Agents for Tax Due DiligenceManagement Consulting World 134Dual harnessGrader: rubric

Task IDtask_683366bd76004f968ebfc93828c076bc

WorldManagement Consulting World 134

Expected outputmessage_in_console

Published runs5 models · dual config

Task prompt

What the agent was asked to do

Assume a scenario where CompliSure can achieve best-in-class R&D rates (low) and gross margin rates based on 2024 competitor benchmarks for years 2025 through 2030, if best-in-class is better than the existing forecast. Recalculate CompliSure's Net Income for 2025-2030. Round final answers to the nearest thousand. - Assume Depreciation & Amortization remains the same value - Income Tax Expense remains the same % of Pre-Tax Income - And all other costs remain the same as a percentage of revenue - Use the financials from 2016 to 2025 and the 5 year forecast for your calculations. Reply back to me the values.

Published trajectories

Agent runs on this task

Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.

Model	Harness	Score	Result	Links
GPT-5.5showcase	dual	0/6	Fail	Share page Public trace
Gemini 3.1 Pro	dual	0/6	Fail	Share page Public trace
GPT-5.4	dual	0/6	Fail	Share page Public trace
GPT-5.4 mini	dual	6/6	Pass	Share page Public trace
GPT-5.4 nano	dual	0/6	Fail	Share page Public trace

Grading rubric

Criteria and grader verdict (showcase run)

States that the recalculated 2025 net income is $7,650,000
Fail
Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states “2025 | $10,924,000.” Assessment: Criterion requires stating recalculated 2025 net income is $7,650,000; the response gives a different value, so fail.
States that the recalculated 2026 net income is $8,497,000
Fail
Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states “2026 | $14,394,000.” Assessment: Criterion requires stating recalculated 2026 net income is $8,497,000; the response gives a different value, so fail.
States that the recalculated 2027 net income is $9,426,000
Fail
Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states “2027 | $18,801,000.” Assessment: Criterion requires stating recalculated 2027 net income is $9,426,000; the response gives a different value, so fail.
States that the recalculated 2028 net income is $10,441,000
Fail
Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states “2028 | $24,797,000.” Assessment: Criterion requires stating recalculated 2028 net income is $10,441,000; the response gives a different value, so fail.
States that the recalculated 2029 net income is $11,546,000
Fail
Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states “2029 | $32,334,000.” Assessment: Criterion requires stating recalculated 2029 net income is $11,546,000; the response gives a different value, so fail.
States that the recalculated 2030 net income is $12,747,000
Fail
Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states “2030 | $41,762,000.” Assessment: Criterion requires stating recalculated 2030 net income is $12,747,000; the response gives a different value, so fail.