Raycaster / evalsBack to AI Agents for Cross-Border Regulatory Review

APEX-Agents · Management Consulting

World 128 - NK - Task 1

1/9Fail

APEX-Agents task World 128 - NK - Task 1 in AI Agents for Cross-Border Regulatory Review. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models — rubric criteria, scores, and public traces.

AI Agents for Cross-Border Regulatory ReviewManagement Consulting World 128Dual harnessGrader: rubric
task_11d91f7c17424faa8f89a5a46c47b76f
Management Consulting World 128
message_in_console
5 models · dual config

Task prompt

What the agent was asked to do

Let's evaluate the new market intelligence we've received to figure out the RMS for competitors in each city. Tell me how many of these cities AmensaDrive operates in in 2026. Format answers to two decimal points. Provide your response right here.

Published trajectories

Agent runs on this task

Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.

ModelHarnessScoreResultLinks
GPT-5.5showcasedual1/9Fail
Gemini 3.1 Produal6/9Fail
GPT-5.4dual1/9Fail
GPT-5.4 minidual1/9Fail
GPT-5.4 nanodual1/9Fail

Grading rubric

Criteria and grader verdict (showcase run)

  1. States Waymo RMS in Los Angeles is 1.00

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> includes a table with only “City | AmensaDrive RMS” and for Los Angeles lists “0.04”; it does not mention Waymo. Assessment: Criterion “States Waymo RMS in Los Angeles is 1.00” is not met because the response does not state Waymo’s Los Angeles RMS.

  2. States Cruise RMS in Los Angeles is 0.75

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> includes only AmensaDrive RMS values and does not mention Cruise in Los Angeles. Assessment: Criterion “States Cruise RMS in Los Angeles is 0.75” is not met because the response omits Cruise’s Los Angeles RMS.

  3. States Tesla RMS in Los Angeles is 0.50

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> lists “Los Angeles | 0.04” under “AmensaDrive RMS” and does not mention Tesla. Assessment: Criterion “States Tesla RMS in Los Angeles is 0.50” is not met because no Tesla Los Angeles RMS is stated.

  4. States Waymo RMS in San Francisco is 1.00

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> lists “San Francisco | 0.12” under “AmensaDrive RMS” and does not mention Waymo. Assessment: Criterion “States Waymo RMS in San Francisco is 1.00” is not met because the response omits Waymo’s San Francisco RMS.

  5. States Cruise RMS in San Francisco is 1.00

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> says “San Francisco only” for AmensaDrive operations and lists AmensaDrive RMS, but does not mention Cruise in San Francisco. Assessment: Criterion “States Cruise RMS in San Francisco is 1.00” is not met because Cruise’s San Francisco RMS is not stated.

  6. States Tesla RMS in San Francisco is 0.67

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> contains no Tesla row or statement for San Francisco; the only San Francisco RMS shown is “AmensaDrive RMS” of “0.12.” Assessment: Criterion “States Tesla RMS in San Francisco is 0.67” is not met because the response omits Tesla’s San Francisco RMS.

  7. States Waymo RMS in Sacramento is 1.00

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> lists “Sacramento | 0.13” under “AmensaDrive RMS” and does not mention Waymo. Assessment: Criterion “States Waymo RMS in Sacramento is 1.00” is not met because Waymo’s Sacramento RMS is not stated.

  8. States Cruise RMS in Sacramento is 0.50

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> includes no Cruise value for Sacramento; it only lists AmensaDrive RMS “Sacramento | 0.13.” Assessment: Criterion “States Cruise RMS in Sacramento is 0.50” is not met because Cruise’s Sacramento RMS is omitted.

  9. States that AmensaDrive operates in one out of the three provided cities

    Pass

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> states “AmensaDrive operates in **1.00** of the three 2026 market-intelligence cities — **San Francisco** only.” Assessment: Criterion “States that AmensaDrive operates in one out of the three provided cities” is met clearly and with two-decimal formatting.