Raycaster / evalsBack to AI Agents for M&A Legal Due Diligence

APEX-Agents · Management Consulting

W134 Nancy Task 09

1/2Fail

APEX-Agents task W134 Nancy Task 09 in AI Agents for M&A Legal Due Diligence. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models — rubric criteria, scores, and public traces.

AI Agents for M&A Legal Due DiligenceManagement Consulting World 134Dual harnessGrader: rubric
task_56967ae9f77e42eeb5a0a5a272b34fe5
Management Consulting World 134
message_in_console
5 models · dual config

Task prompt

What the agent was asked to do

If competitors continue growing by their 2021-2024 revenue CAGR, while their operating margin % stays flat from 2025, which players will have better operating income than CompliSure by 2030? How much will they be better? Use the financial dataset for 2016 to '25, along with our 5 year forecast. Round to the nearest thousand. Reply to me with your answer here.

Published trajectories

Agent runs on this task

Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.

ModelHarnessScoreResultLinks
GPT-5.5showcasedual1/2Fail
Gemini 3.1 Produal1/2Fail
GPT-5.4dual0/2Fail
GPT-5.4 minidual1/2Fail
GPT-5.4 nanodual0/2Fail

Grading rubric

Criteria and grader verdict (showcase run)

  1. States that Syncore will have better operating income than Complisure by 2030

    Pass

    Evidence: The response states, “Syncore | $26,062,000 | Yes | $18,725,000” and “the only player projected to have better 2030 operating income than CompliSure is Syncore.” Assessment: Criterion asks whether it states Syncore will have better operating income than CompliSure by 2030; pass, this is explicitly stated.

  2. States that Syncore's expected 2030 operating income is $17,720,000 higher than Complisure's

    Fail

    Evidence: The response states Syncore’s “Amount Better” is “$18,725,000” and says “by approximately $18.725 million.” Assessment: Criterion requires stating Syncore is $17,720,000 higher than CompliSure; fail, the response gives a different amount.