APEX-Agents · Management Consulting
Task ncwq9a4b
APEX-Agents task Task ncwq9a4b in AI Agents for Legal Contract Review. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models — rubric criteria, scores, and public traces.
Task prompt
What the agent was asked to do
Given our current set of CDP questionnaire responses for Horizon's portfolio companies, identify the three largest risks by potential financial impact across all entries. In cases where a minimum and maximum impact are listed for an individual risk, use the midpoint. For risks where there is no impact figure listed, assume it is zero. If two risks are tied in terms of dollar impact, prioritize the more recent risk as of 2024. Reply back to me, outlining the 3 Risks (defined as the combination of the company, year, and type of risk), the Financial Impact, and the Mitigation Ratio (defined as the cost to correct the risk divided by the potential financial impact). Give figures in the currency indicated in section C0.4 of their associate CDP response file. Round Mitigation Ratio to the nearest 0.01, and give long form currency values.
Published trajectories
Agent runs on this task
Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.
| Model | Harness | Score | Result | Links |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5.5showcase | dual | 1/6 | Fail | Share pagePublic trace |
| Gemini 3.1 Pro | dual | 1/6 | Fail | Share pagePublic trace |
| GPT-5.4 | dual | 1/6 | Fail | Share pagePublic trace |
| GPT-5.4 mini | dual | 3/6 | Fail | Share pagePublic trace |
| GPT-5.4 nano | dual | 3/6 | Fail | Share pagePublic trace |
Grading rubric
Criteria and grader verdict (showcase run)
States that the potential financial impact of Coca-Cola's Carbon Pricing Mechanism risk from 2022 is $4,800,000,000
FailEvidence: The response lists “Coca-Cola, 2022 — Climate risk: Emerging regulation / Carbon pricing mechanisms” with “Financial Impact | USD 3,450,000,000 — midpoint of USD 2,100,000,000 and USD 4,800,000,000.” Assessment: The criterion requires stating the potential financial impact is $4,800,000,000; the response states $3,450,000,000 as the financial impact, so this fails.
States that the mitigation ratio for Coca-Cola's Carbon Pricing Mechanism risk from 2022 is 15.74
FailEvidence: For Coca-Cola 2022 Carbon pricing mechanisms, the response gives “Mitigation Ratio | 0.09.” Assessment: The criterion requires a mitigation ratio of 15.74; the stated ratio is 0.09, so this fails.
States that the potential financial impact of PepsiCo's Rising Mean Temperature risk from 2021 is $1,300,000,000
PassEvidence: The response lists “PepsiCo, 2021 — Climate risk: Chronic physical / Rising mean temperatures” with “Financial Impact | USD 1,300,000,000.” Assessment: The criterion requires stating the potential financial impact is $1,300,000,000; this is clearly stated, so this passes.
States that the mitigation ratio for PepsiCo's Rising Mean Temperature risk from 2021 is 1.53
FailEvidence: For PepsiCo 2021 Rising mean temperatures, the response gives “Mitigation Ratio | 0.65.” Assessment: The criterion requires a mitigation ratio of 1.53; the response states 0.65, so this fails.
States that the potential financial impact of PepsiCo Changing Temperature risk from 2023 is $1,100,000,000
FailEvidence: The response’s three risks are Coca-Cola 2022 water, Coca-Cola 2022 carbon pricing, and PepsiCo 2021 rising mean temperatures; it does not mention “PepsiCo Changing Temperature risk from 2023.” Assessment: The criterion requires stating that risk’s potential financial impact is $1,100,000,000; it is absent, so this fails.
States that the mitigation ratio for PepsiCo's Changing Temperature risk from 2023 is 1.00
FailEvidence: The response does not include any PepsiCo 2023 Changing Temperature risk; the only PepsiCo row is “PepsiCo, 2021 — ... Rising mean temperatures” with ratio 0.65. Assessment: The criterion requires stating the 2023 Changing Temperature risk mitigation ratio is 1.00; it is not stated, so this fails.