Raycaster/ Eval

APEX-Agents · Law

Task iv36a08a

Best published6/7Fail

APEX-Agents task Task iv36a08a in AI Agents for SEC Disclosure Analysis. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models, scores, and public traces.

AI Agents for SEC Disclosure AnalysisLaw World 415Dual harnessGrader: rubric
task_7fe79f6934f64f159f8a6c27901e3db8
Law World 415
message_in_console
6 models · dual config

Task prompt

What the agent was asked to do

Analyze whether Counts 1-7 of Delta's Complaint against CrowdStrike fall within the limitation of liability clause in Section 10.1 of CrowdStrike's standard MSA, indicating "Covered" or "Not Covered" for each count. Reply back to me here with your assessments.

Published trajectories

Agent runs on this task

Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.

ModelHarnessScoreResultLinks
Gemini 3.1 Produal6/7Fail
fireworks models Kimi K2dual3/7Fail
GPT-5.4dual1/7Fail
GPT-5.4 minidual1/7Fail
GPT-5.4 nanodual1/7Fail
GPT-5.5dual1/7Fail

Grading rubric

Rubric criteria

Runs are graded against these criteria. Open a run for model-specific verdicts.

  1. States that Count 1 is Not Covered

  2. States that Count 2 is Not Covered

  3. States that Count 3 is Not Covered

  4. States that Count 4 is Not Covered

  5. States that Count 5 is Covered

  6. States that Count 6 is Not Covered

  7. States that Count 7 is Not Covered