Raycaster / evalsBack to AI Agents for Cross-Border Regulatory Review

APEX-Agents · Management Consulting

SP Task 01 World 128

6/6Pass

APEX-Agents task SP Task 01 World 128 in AI Agents for Cross-Border Regulatory Review. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models — rubric criteria, scores, and public traces.

AI Agents for Cross-Border Regulatory ReviewManagement Consulting World 128Dual harnessGrader: rubric
task_976f61c9753f494a9ad012af60b3309c
Management Consulting World 128
message_in_console
5 models · dual config

Task prompt

What the agent was asked to do

Can you look at the target Operating Mode standards and the competitor benchmark file to determine if Tesla is adhering to the capital intensity safety limit? Identify the difference between this target Capex limit and Tesla's actual Capex % of Revenue. Then, see if First Solar is profitable enough given its growth speed by categorizing First Solar’s growth tier using its 3-yr Rev CAGR (High >30%, Med 10-30%, Low <10%), and state the gap vs. their actual Operating Margin %. Also, evaluate Alphabet’s R&D intensity against the standard baseline. Provide your final answers to the nearest integer. Write our what you find here as a message.

Published trajectories

Agent runs on this task

Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.

ModelHarnessScoreResultLinks
GPT-5.5showcasedual6/6Pass
Gemini 3.1 Produal6/6Pass
GPT-5.4dual6/6Pass
GPT-5.4 minidual6/6Pass
GPT-5.4 nanodual4/6Fail

Grading rubric

Criteria and grader verdict (showcase run)

  1. States that Tesla is adhering to the capital intensity safety limits

    Pass

    Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE says, “Yes, Tesla is adhering to the capital intensity safety limit.” Assessment: Criterion asks whether it states Tesla is adhering; pass.

  2. States the difference between Max Allowable CapEx percentage in the Target Capital Intensity Ceiling and Tesla's actual CapEx % of Revenue is 8 percentage points

    Pass

    Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE says Tesla has a “20% CapEx ceiling” and “actual CapEx is 12% of revenue,” giving “8 percentage points of headroom.” Assessment: Criterion asks for an 8 percentage point difference; pass.

  3. States that First Solar is not currently meeting the profitability target for its growth profile

    Pass

    Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE says First Solar is “12 percentage points below target” and “not profitable enough for its growth speed.” Assessment: Criterion asks whether it states First Solar is not currently meeting profitability target for its growth profile; pass.

  4. States the difference between First Solar's actual Operating Margin vs. their Target Operating Margin is -12 percentage points

    Pass

    Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE says target operating margin is “30%,” actual is “18%,” and First Solar is “12 percentage points below target.” Assessment: Criterion requires the difference actual vs target is -12 percentage points; although phrased as below target, it clearly conveys -12 pp; pass.

  5. States that Alphabet's R&D Intensity trails the standard baseline

    Pass

    Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE says “Alphabet’s actual R&D intensity is 14%, so it is 6 percentage points below the baseline.” Assessment: Criterion asks whether Alphabet's R&D Intensity trails the standard baseline; pass.

  6. States that the difference between Alphabet's actual R&D % of Revenue and the standard allocation for R&D is -6 percentage points

    Pass

    Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE says the baseline is “20% of revenue,” actual is “14%,” and Alphabet is “6 percentage points below the baseline.” Assessment: Criterion requires actual minus standard allocation is -6 percentage points; the response clearly states 6 pp below, equivalent to -6 pp; pass.