Raycaster / evalsBack to AI Agents for Hospitality Loyalty Strategy

APEX-Agents · Management Consulting

Change in Competitor SG&A Spend by Category_Task02_SC

0/7Fail

APEX-Agents task Change in Competitor SG&A Spend by Category_Task02_SC in AI Agents for Hospitality Loyalty Strategy. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models — rubric criteria, scores, and public traces.

AI Agents for Hospitality Loyalty StrategyManagement Consulting World 112.1Dual harnessGrader: rubric
Task IDtask_449e96fd1efb4a7f9ecbb65e82fbd6c1
WorldManagement Consulting World 112.1
Expected outputmessage_in_console
Published runs5 models · dual config

Task prompt

What the agent was asked to do

Analyze the SG&A files to compare the CAGR trends of competitors versus Impact’s US business across 2020–22 and 2022–24. For each SG&A Category, determine the percentage point change in CAGR between these periods, calculating the straight average across competitors and a specific value for Impact US. Tell me the SG&A category where the absolute percentage point difference between Impact’s CAGR change and the competitor average is the greatest. - State the percentage point changes for both Impact and the competitor average. - Identify the category with the largest difference between Impact and competitors. Percentage point outputs should be rounded to the nearest 0.01%. Write out what you find as a message back to me here.

Published trajectories

Agent runs on this task

Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.

ModelHarnessScoreResultLinks
GPT-5.5showcasedual0/7FailShare pagePublic trace
Gemini 3.1 Produal2/7FailShare pagePublic trace
GPT-5.4dual7/7PassShare pagePublic trace
GPT-5.4 minidual7/7PassShare pagePublic trace
GPT-5.4 nanodual7/7PassShare pagePublic trace

Grading rubric

Criteria and grader verdict (showcase run)

  1. States that the average competitor percentage point change in Facilities & Admin spend CAGR from 2020–22 to 2022–24 is -18.70%

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> states only “Competitor average CAGR change: +1.43 percentage points” for “U.S. SG&A.” Assessment: The criterion requires stating Facilities & Admin competitor change is -18.70%; this value/category is not stated, so fail.

  2. States that the average competitor percentage point change in General & Administrative spend CAGR from 2020–22 to 2022–24 is 0.92%

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> states only “Competitor average CAGR change: +1.43 percentage points” and does not mention General & Administrative. Assessment: The criterion requires stating General & Administrative competitor change is 0.92%; not present, so fail.

  3. States that the average competitor percentage point change in Sales & Marketing spend CAGR from 2020–22 to 2022–24 is 1.77%

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> states only “Competitor average CAGR change: +1.43 percentage points” and does not mention Sales & Marketing. Assessment: The criterion requires stating Sales & Marketing competitor change is 1.77%; not present, so fail.

  4. States that the percentage point change in Facilities & Admin spend CAGR from 2020–22 to 2022–24 for Impact US is 5.06%

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> says “Impact US CAGR change: +5.60 percentage points” for “U.S. SG&A,” with no Facilities & Admin value. Assessment: The criterion requires stating Facilities & Admin Impact US change is 5.06%; not stated, so fail.

  5. States that the percentage point change in General & Administrative spend CAGR from 2020–22 to 2022–24 for Impact US is 5.14%

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> says “Impact US CAGR change: +5.60 percentage points” and does not mention General & Administrative. Assessment: The criterion requires stating General & Administrative Impact US change is 5.14%; not present, so fail.

  6. States that the percentage point change in Sales & Marketing spend CAGR from 2020–22 to 2022–24 for Impact US is 5.69%

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> says “Impact US CAGR change: +5.60 percentage points” and does not mention Sales & Marketing. Assessment: The criterion requires stating Sales & Marketing Impact US change is 5.69%; not present, so fail.

  7. States that the SG&A category with the largest percentage point difference in change in CAGR from 2020-22 and 2022-24 between Impact US and the average of competitors is Facilities & Admin

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> identifies “Largest divergence category: U.S. SG&A” and repeats “the category ... is U.S. SG&A.” Assessment: The criterion requires identifying Facilities & Admin as the largest difference; the response gives a different category, so fail.